Some people think young people are not suitable for important positions in the government, while other people think it is a good idea for young people to take on these positions. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
A rising number of young people have ambition to occupy vital positions to run their nations. While many people opine that this proclivity would be beneficial for the countries, others doubt that the ebullience of young age will cause serious damages. This essay will highlight both views before presenting my own opinion.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that lack of social experience and life skills could not assure the effectiveness of work performed by youngsters. A significant point is that inexperienced young people often jump at the decisions without careful consideration, putting the whole nation in jeopardy. To specify, insufficient visions and skills may lead to infeasible suggestions, although they seem to be reviving and appealing on the paper. In addition, due to access to digital devices and quick absorption of up-to-date trends, young leaders may discover ideas in lieu of conventional features and ethic values.
On the other hand, there are inevitable merits of the domination by young people in holding powerful positions. Firstly, enthusiasm and the spirit are the inspiration for the willingness to try new things. In particular, provided the readiness to encounter challenges, nations would experience alterations that may be advantageous. For example, countries such as Singapore and Korea, which are well-known around the world in terms of economic growth and worthwhile social values, are headed by the youngs. Moreover, thanks to improved education and standard of life, young people are offered all-rounded development physically and mentally. This makes them suitable for the enhancement of nations in the period of constant changes and globalization.
In short, it is inarguable that both sides have reasonable pros and cons as mentioned above. However, from my perspectives, it is better to let the youth drive the nations forward as long as they are provided with adequate training and encouragement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-18 | idid382002 | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | rookiewriter | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | rookiewriter | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | rookiewriter | 67 | view |
| 2019-05-15 | Jenny213987 | 89 | view |
- The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities; Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- IN order to solve traffic problems, governments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation. What are the advs and disadvs of such a solution 78
- Some people think young people are not suitable for important positions in the government, while other people think it is a good idea for young people to take on these positions. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 89
- In most countries, prison is an effective solution for the problem of crime. Some people think it is a more effective solution to provide a better education. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- some countries there is is insufficient recycling of waste materials (eg paper, glass and cans). What are the reasons and solutions? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in particular, in short, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47682119205 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02076058598 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632450331126 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1804782231 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.266666667 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284151852878 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818357004532 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772930533711 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150488552381 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105135733178 0.056905535591 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.