education
Although topics, in all likelihood, will never yield a consensual agreement, a constructive dialogue on education's purposes can lead to thought-provoking discussions. Although some people are of the belief that purpose of education is to prepare the future workforce and make good members of society, others have an opposite view of education should lead to self-fulfillment. My view is that irrespective of the numerous arguments that exits on either sides, learning could have several positive impacts on good members of society.
First and foremost, there are numerous reasons in favor of my stance. To commence with, learning has several points to develop future generations' self- esteem and cognitive skills. Additionally, it is crucial to note that when students concentrate in their studies, they probably get better job opportunities in the future. Therefore, the aforementioned discussion shows that the governments should put various measures to reap the fruits of education.
Secondly, anther pivotal aspect of the argument is that education could develop soft skills of youngsters. In addition, as soon as young people will be enrolled in a university education, their earning capacities may be improved. Consequently, it exemplifies that the educationalists have to conduct extra-curricular activities to let students get the benefits of education.
In conclusion, after I manifested the above notions, it could be observed that there is equally potential evidence to support the above notions, and hence my view is that education has various privileges in enhancing the performance of future workforce.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Rafia Jawad | 80 | view |
| 2024-11-18 | Rafia Jawad | 77 | view |
| 2024-09-10 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-05-21 | Rafia Jawad | 55 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 244.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66393442623 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31525713295 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598360655738 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1646624689 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.636363636 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1818181818 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72727272727 7.25397266985 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221201757956 0.242375264174 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074707816782 0.0925447433944 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105339602267 0.071462118173 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122590269709 0.151781067708 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873257530196 0.0609392437508 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.16 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.