In many countries, old or traditional languages are dying out or being forgotten, especially by younger people. Is this an acceptable development which occurs inevitably, or is it something which we should try to prevent.
In the environment of widely spread globalization, there are variable consequences happen. One of them could be named as a waste of historical roots, such as traditions, culture or language. In the essay, there will be discussed an ancient language should be wasted or kept.
On the one hand, the entire society is forming during many centuries developing its own set of words and definitions, which could be called native language. In this case, keeping a homeland way of communication is a crucial condition to protect a self-identity for any Peoples. It appears the most important with small nations, for instance, American natives, Caucasians or Africans. Therefore, all people, who are associated with a local area, try to study a home language for feeling more confident, holistic and self-defined. It especially works for the youngsters when they change their habitat relocating to another country for education, work or immigration purposes. In these reasons, it could be assumed that leaving of a homeland speech is getting a major target for this category of citizens.
On the other hand, there are different obstacles seem in this story such as globalization, internationalism, and convenience, which could be treated as major factors supporting the idea to eliminate or even forget a language. In terms of a growing level of migration and integration into an immense part of the population speaking English, Chinese or Spanish, non-using language becomes unnecessary. As far as assimilation should be passed effectively, most of the young people are getting lost the first language to for the sake of being more integrated into a new culture. Another reason, why it is important to proceed with your verbal skills as fast as possible, could be an economical value creating by foreign comers. It might come faster driven by finding a better job, getting promotion rapidly or occupying a specific working niche.
Concluding, it seems that there is nothing dramatic that youngsters get lost their knowledge of native speaking. Nowadays, a language becomes a global tool of efficient collaboration, negotiation, and integration. Hence, does not matter, where are you from, every person becomes one of the entire humankind.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-14 | Mostafaasadi | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-17 | anna5224 | 89 | view |
- Some people say that the Internet is responsible for destroying social skills of teenagers and young adults.Why do you think the Internet is seen as dangerous in this way and what can we do to ensure that it does not harm the social development of teenage 78
- Crime appears to be rising in most countries in the world, especially among young people. Identify the possible causes of this trend, and propose some solutions you think would be effective. 61
- The first car appeared on British roads in 1888. By the year 2000 there may be as many as 29 million vehicles on British roads.Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership and use.To what e 78
- Some students have rented the apartment next to yours. Their parties are upsetting you, your family and other tenants. 78
- Some people prefer to provide help and support directly to those in the local community who need it. Others, however, prefer to give money to national and international charitable organizations. Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, so, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1835.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31884057971 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09213554804 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614492753623 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0274670246 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.941176471 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2941176471 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.52941176471 7.06120827912 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164598626989 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458708564178 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481908134053 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0889543770163 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421417364077 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.