The world natural resources are consumed at an ever-increased rate. What are the dangers of this situation? What should we do?
The intimate connection between the environment and human's lives has raised much concern of the public. Many claim that world resources from the nature are exploited on a regular basis and this consumption level continues to grow really fast. There are a number of harmful consequences of this problem and thus some methods should be applied to lessen the seriousness of it.
To begin with, if humans have little intention to stop overusing the natural resources such as water or woods, we ultimately have to face with unexpected results. In fact, water taken from significant depth underground or mountainous strings plays an indispensable role to ensure the proper operations of countless activities involved. Growing seasonal crops or raising livestock shall demand a specific amount of water which, in some cases, could not or cost too much money for people to artificially create. Any shortage of water could cause a huge impact on such plants and animals, making humans suffer since they depend on such creatures for food. In addition, the overconsumption of forest woods for industrial purposes highly likely leads to the loss of habitats of millions of species or the excess amount of greenhouse gas which is the culprit of global warming.
Therefore, such actions should be taken to prevent the negative influences that later generations have to cope with. First, the messages about environmental protection could be incorporated into marketing campaigns and spread to every individual, regardless of age, on a global scale. By doing this, more and more people will be aware of the precious value of the water they use and be more willing to save it. Second, experts might propose a new kind of material to replace the presence of forest woods used in factories as a major source to produce paper. Alternatively, companies taking advantages of the trees have their responsibilities to accelerate forest regrowth.
In conclusion, the world natural resources are vital for both humans and many creatures sharing the same planet as us. The continuous growth in their consumption will make us suffer in later life, so it is urgent to find new solutions to alleviate this problem as soon as possible.
- Developments in technology has brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and give 89
- In many cities, an increasing number of people do not know their neighbours and the sense of community is lost. Discuss the causes and give measures to turn it around. 89
- Some people think the qualities a person needs to become successful in today's world cannot be learned at a university or similar academic institution. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Schools are no longer necessary because children can get so much information available through the internet, and they can study just as well at home. To what extent do agree or disagree? 89
- Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun claim seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many claims'.
Suggestion: Many claims
... has raised much concern of the public. Many claim that world resources from the nature ar...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, really, second, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, such as, in some cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1856.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15555555556 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83093035355 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613888888889 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.2624902107 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 123.733333333 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107133051487 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0338746405141 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410600561404 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0707519264685 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345149815616 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.