Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
While utilitarians argue that college should only offer to students subjects highly relevant to employment, like Computer, Mechanism and Medicine, I believe that students are ought to be free in the acquisition of knowledge.
such restrictions bring a great merit at first sight. They compel students to focus on practical subjects. As a result, college students are more likely to delve deep in the subjects they engage in and grow into technically better practitioners, for instance, a doctor better informed about the development of disease research. However, if you scratch the face, you will find the confinement comes with disadvantages. It would cause college to produce students insufficient, not in quantities but in varieties. Perhaps industries regarding a handful of subjects constitute the pillar of national economy, but a health and sustainable economy is composed of much more additional sectors, like farming, animal feeding and so on. We need universities produce talents specialized in such areas, in addition to programmers, lawyers, etc.
University students should not be limited in pursuit of knowledge. The most important reason is that young people need to try a wide range of subjects before finding out what they really want to do. One cannot arrive at the answer immediately; they, in most cases, obtain it through patient efforts. If access to less practical subjects is limited, chance is little for students to figure out what really interest them.
In conclusion, college students should not be limited from learning whatever they like, despite the benefits it may bring.
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 61
- In many countries today respect is shown to older people.What do you think may be the reasons for this?What problems might this cause in society? 56
- Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this can not be changed, while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- Full-time education is necessary for all individuals before the age of 18 56
- Students work whiling study. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Such
...ee in the acquisition of knowledge. such restrictions bring a great merit at fir...
^^^^
Line 3, column 520, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in quantities but in varieties. Perhaps industries regarding a handful of subjec...
^^
Line 3, column 835, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n addition to programmers, lawyers, etc. University students should be free in pu...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 357, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...imited, chance is little for students to find out what really interest them. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, really, regarding, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1336.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.344 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90247894049 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.64 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1687987504 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.769230769 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2307692308 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268401354485 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0900157062827 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734532797196 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175524804668 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381757073947 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.