Experimental learning is more effective way to teach than book. DO you agree or disagree ?

Essay topics:

Experimental learning is more effective way to teach than book. DO you agree or disagree ?

Our global diaspora is divided into two halves oriental and and occidental There are bound to
be difference on economic, social and cultural front as well.Therefore ,experiential learning is
the effective ways to teach than books. experiential learning is the way of learning practically
and books are only base on theoretical terms.

Ont only this ,another pivotal ascept of given statement of given statement is we are on 21 st
century everything happinings around us or everything waht we use on our daily life to make
our word easy is only possible because of scientific experiment and practical knowledge.books
can only provides information about but experience is the master key to show us how works
can be done.

Further more, experimental learning gives us critical thinking, problem solving and decision
making skills which is far more useful or practical than teaching books. we can also say that
reading book for learn driving doesn’t make sense we have to learn practically by taking classes.
However, some people believe that reading books is effective way we can get better
knowledge, skills and ideas from books but I personally opine this and agreed that
experinantal learning is the most effective and practical ways of learning where people can
learn from different ways for example by role playing, group discussion etc.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-17 adksujan 77 view
2019-02-09 Ahmed145 85 view
2018-09-21 kjl 64 view
2018-09-12 YashPTE 72 view
2018-08-25 anbansal27 55 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user adksujan :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...ora is divided into two halves oriental and and occidental There are bound to be diffe...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 62, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...omic, social and cultural front as well.Therefore ,experiential learning is the effectiv...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 71, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ial and cultural front as well.Therefore ,experiential learning is the effective ...
^^
Line 3, column 41, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Experiential
...the effective ways to teach than books. experiential learning is the way of learning practic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e on theoretical terms. Ont only this ,another pivotal ascept of given statemen...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
... of given statement is we are on 21 st century everything happinings around us or ever...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 74, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...seful or practical than teaching books. we can also say that reading book for lea...
^^
Line 14, column 24, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to drive'.
Suggestion: to drive
...n also say that reading book for learn driving doesn't make sense we have to lear...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, well, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 31.9359605911 66% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1160.0 1207.87684729 96% => OK
No of words: 217.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34562211982 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89386245188 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 139.433497537 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622119815668 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.65517241379 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 12.6551724138 47% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 20.5024630542 176% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 105.989648342 50.4703680194 210% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 193.333333333 104.977214359 184% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.1666666667 20.9669160288 172% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.25397266985 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 15.0 4.12807881773 363% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 5.33497536946 150% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300091909061 0.242375264174 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162941238154 0.0925447433944 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808303163612 0.071462118173 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10115637363 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0998476526558 0.0609392437508 164% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.9 12.6369458128 173% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.94 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 10.9458128079 158% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 55.0591133005 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 9.94827586207 206% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.3980295567 158% => OK
text_standard: 22.0 10.5123152709 209% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.