Some people suggest that each family should have one car and not encourage alternative vehicle. Give your opinion.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world colossal upsurge in that some people advise that four wheelers like cars should have to the whole family for the beneficial of the enviornment. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myraid of concerns in one's life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
There are a number of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderantone is that small families should have one car and no any alternative car, can not only contribute to increase pollution but also lead to numerous other benefits in various feilds. Thanks to wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
There are, however, some pitfalls that can easily overwhelm the potential benefits of rich people like millionaire and billionaires are fond of cars. Mostly rich people have four to five cars in their home. The primary one stems from the fact that by observing the aforementioned trend, people have not only realised its gravity, but also gauged the magnitude of its repercussions when it comes to today's ever changing lifestyle. Besides, its impact on cars is far reaching indeed. Hence, it is apparent why many are against big families also have atleast two cars for comfort.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite some drawbacks, the benefits of this process is happening all over the world which have big impact of increase in pollution are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-20 | khehra mandeep | 55 | view |
| 2019-08-19 | khehra mandeep | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-19 | manpreet9999 | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-19 | harry J | 80 | view |
| 2019-08-19 | jashan randhawa | 55 | view |
- Some people suggest that each family should have one car and not encourage alternative vehicle. Give your opinion. 80
- Do you think consumer should avoid over packed product or it is responsibility of producers? 11
- There are social, medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones. Do you agree that the problems outweigh the benefits f mobile phones? 55
- Certain Kind of music promote learning in life. Agree or disagree? 55
- Smoking should be banned in all the public places. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 276, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ll only lead to a myraid of concerns in ones life. However, I do not entirely accept...
^^^^
Line 2, column 127, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... small families should have one car and no any alternative car, can not only contr...
^^
Line 2, column 302, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s to wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it co...
^^
Line 2, column 350, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhan...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 306.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85294117647 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63740068115 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.2202068802 50.4703680194 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.230769231 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5384615385 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.23076923077 7.25397266985 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247727779246 0.242375264174 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859072803428 0.0925447433944 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744307309927 0.071462118173 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14707209377 0.151781067708 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415871395947 0.0609392437508 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.5310837438 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.