Some people say that protecting the environment is the government’s responsibility. Others believe that every individual should take responsibility for it.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
The responsibility for preserving the environment is a debatable issue. One part of the society believes that it is on the relevant to the government, but the other one has the opposite idea, and it is said people should take measures. I strongly believe that the government ought to be given this duty.
On the one hand, it is mentioned that the government ought to conserve nature. There is a variety of justification behind this idea. As everybody knows, it has the biggest budget, and also most of the governments throughout the world have at least one ministry which was established to preventing the nature from destruction. It means so many employees are being gotten salaries just to protect our nature. It can be seen that they have so many machinery, tools, and obviously afford to utilize costly devices and approaches to promote their causes. Moreover, the government can keep the much firmer hand on saving nature by legislation. Having set the new federal rules, it will be better conservation. Eventually, the more money spends in, and the more extensive the whole organization members involvement, the more substantial the results are likely to be.
On the other hand, another dominate idea is people should take measures. Although individual either can facilitate or destroy the environmental conservation, should not be forgotten, there are so many factors caused that their activities limited just for a few periods and zones. Few budgets, time limitation, and the amount of area which can be protected efficiency by them are only a handful of barriers. Hence, these severe limitations are preventing the effective influence of their actions.
In conclusion, despite various ideas, I firmly believe just government can conduct actions against natural destroys.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-15 | ANUBHAV PRASHAR | 89 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | Ankita singh | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-01 | Ankita singh | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-29 | farlotfi | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-28 | mohamadre3a | 67 | view |
- many criminals commit further crimes as soon as they released from prison.What do you think are the causes of this?What possible solutions can you suggest? 61
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as unsatisfactory job of shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
- in many countries women and men are working full-time. It is therefore logical for women and men to share household tasks. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 67
- Children who have brothers and sisters often have better social development than an onlychild. The government should therefore give money to parents to have two or morechildren.’ What do you think about this proposal? 84
- Some people believe the aim of university education is to help graduates get better jobs. Others believe there are much wider benefits of university education for both individuals and society.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 441, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun machinery seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much machinery', 'a good deal of machinery'.
Suggestion: much machinery; a good deal of machinery
...ature. It can be seen that they have so many machinery, tools, and obviously afford to utilize...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, at least, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26480836237 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93154175127 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606271777003 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.8474502374 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4375 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9375 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149140611448 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513216702247 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543049090823 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106369926799 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0709728199681 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.