Fresh water resources diminish in large cities in the world each year, what are the causes of this crucial problem? what are the solutions?
The importance fresh water resources diminish in large cities which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while other reject this notion. This will further elaborate causes and solutions of this trend. This will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant stems from the fact that people using a lot of water in their home because of that fresh water resources is diminish further more sewerage water is getting mix in fresh which that diminishing to fresh water. As an illustration big companies and limited factories using a lot of water. For instance earth water is getting down day by day. Another pivotal aspects of this trend when oily water mix in fresh water then diseases is spreading like cancer is most hazardous disease which that spread from water. Needless to say all these merits stand fresh water resources diminish in large cities.
However there are some solutions that negate this argument and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but the most alarming is that people should collect rain water and should clean for any work. Government should take strict steps for factories which mixing chemical water in earth water. As well as people should put save water notes on school walls for students which will aware to them about water besides, government should treatment to them who suffer from cancer Hence it is apparent why many are against fresh water resources diminish in large cities.
According to the argument aforementioned above one can reach a conclusion that the causes of fresh water resources diminish in large cities are instrumental indeed nevertheless the potential solutions should not be overlooked either.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-04 | Jaskaransingh11 | 80 | view |
| 2018-05-20 | Manisha Verma | 77 | view |
- The medical technology is responsible for increasing the average life expectancy Do you think it is curse or a blessing 38
- Should library use digital gadgets to provide information on different topics? pros and cons 79
- Fresh water resources diminish in large cities in the world each year, what are the cause of this crucial problem? what are the solutions? 80
- Medical technology is responsible for the human's life expectancy. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 80
- The medical technology is responsible for increasing the average life expectancy. Do you think it is a curse or a blessings? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'diminished'.
Suggestion: diminished
...ecause of that fresh water resources is diminish further more sewerage water is getting ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...r resources diminish in large cities. However there are some solutions that negate th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, look, nevertheless, so, then, well, while, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 5.94088669951 286% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18243243243 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47558383814 2.71678728327 91% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52027027027 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 464.4 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 88.9452078529 50.4703680194 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.833333333 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.25397266985 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308880244872 0.242375264174 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134290118454 0.0925447433944 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709051094927 0.071462118173 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223106213514 0.151781067708 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040316017897 0.0609392437508 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.