The belching and unauthorized behavior is unacceptable in modern offices. How far you support this view? Give your response with justification.
Recently, the belching and unauthorized behavior in modern offices has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are the Cons and Pros of it?" Whereas it is a widely held view that the misbehavior in modern offices is acceptable, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the society standpoint, standards of behavior are bound up inextricably with social norm, which indicates they lead to both acceptable behavior and authorized behavior. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between breaking law and antisocial bahavior as well as an exponential increase in violent acts. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of paid-employment is correlated positively with not only human behavior but also company director .
Within the realm of psychological, without the slightest doubt, belching actions attribute to worker's performance, in that it would come down to misleading, job opprtunities, and modern society. A salient example of such attribution is civilization, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take more facilities for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint modern lifestyle problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of companies, government, and individuals.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the disadvantages of the belching and unauthorized behavior in modern offices far outweigh its advantages. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-16 | Maheswari | 11 | view |
| 2019-09-12 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2019-06-01 | zjaved | 77 | view |
| 2018-07-18 | Rajnidevi | 77 | view |
| 2018-06-23 | Manisha Verma | 85 | view |
- "The illiterates of the 21st century are not those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn"- Alvin Toffler. Explain the statement and do you agree or disagree. The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power pro 80
- Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. Which opinion do you agree with? Discuss both options and give examples 88
- “In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed”. Does a common man suffer from a group’s ideology? Express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and examples. 88
- Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any disease? Pros & Cons? 88
- The envornment we are live in is in danger due to various problems. So what do you think should be responsible for solving it.Is the government,organizations or individuals. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 626, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...human behavior but also company director . Within the realm of psychologic...
^^
Line 19, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79642857143 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29950625942 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 139.433497537 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.667857142857 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.9548389561 50.4703680194 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.545454545 104.977214359 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4545454545 20.9669160288 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203260807612 0.242375264174 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572456912185 0.0925447433944 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566491563199 0.071462118173 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111107791903 0.151781067708 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395553259536 0.0609392437508 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 12.6369458128 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.97 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.5 9.94827586207 216% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.