We have entered a throw-away society and fill the environment with rubbish. What are the causes and what are your solutions?
Recently, creation of the throw-away scociety has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are the causes of a polluted environment?". Whereas it is a widely held view that government nust be liable to challenge with this issue, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the public standpoint, preservation of environment is bound up inextricably with government, which indicates it leads to both investment and individual's learning. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between goods manufactures and developed industry as well as an exponential increase in air pollution. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of modern life-style is correlated positively with not only polluted street but also hazards damaging.
Within the realm of environment, without the slightest doubt, recycleing process attribute to human activities, in that it would come down to sea pollution, black smoke car, and fossil fuel. A salient example of such attribution is global warming, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take modern society for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint human health problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of child education.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that individuals as the same governmnet must be accountable to solve this problem. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-13 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
| 2018-06-14 | sanduni jayasekara | 77 | view |
| 2018-04-29 | bashirheidari | 11 | view |
- Medical technology is responsible for the human s life expectancy To what extent do you agree or disagree Or Medical technology helps to live long life Is that curse or blessing for society and mankind 93
- People can perform everyday tasks, such as shopping and banking as well as business transactions, without meeting other people face-to-face because of technology.What are the effects of this on individual and society as a whole? 88
- People usually mix their private and professional life. What are the pros and cons of this? 77
- With technology speeding up, more and more young people begin to use mobile phones and the Internet, but old people have little chance to be exposed to them. What ways could mobile phone and the Internet be useful to old people? How can old people be enco 88
- Does a certain type of music affect young children's learning? Agree/disagree 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 19, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69202898551 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.255180222 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.699275362319 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.485002926 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.916666667 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.25397266985 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175328873569 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487378681202 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572860922017 0.071462118173 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.093581923961 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484833642703 0.0609392437508 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.9 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.