People are moving to urban areas from rural areas for better life. What do you think about?
Recently, moving to urban areas from rural areas has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what do people move from rural areas to urban areas?". Whereas it is a widely held view that it is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the society standpoint, urban areas are bound up inextricably with welfare, which indicates they lead to both easy access and more facilities. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between communication services and telecommunication as well as an exponential increase in job opportunities. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of citizenship migration is correlated positively with not only family income but also household expenditure.
Within the realm of economy, without the slightest doubt, rural region attribute to slummed housing, in that it would come down to non-wealthy residences, deprived neighborhood, and antisocial behaviors. A salient example of such attribution is professional career, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take city population for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint urbanization problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to air pollution, traffic jam, and even public transport. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of investment government in construction projects.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that people move to urban regions to find better life standards. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-25 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | mojtaba1980 | 75 | view |
| 2019-08-12 | Simranjot7087 | 85 | view |
| 2019-05-29 | zjaved | 80 | view |
| 2019-04-20 | zjaved | 85 | view |
- There are social, medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones. What forms do they take? Do you agree that the problems outweigh the benefits of mobile phones? 85
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. Choose which position you most ag 85
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
- Discuss both sides of Space travel vs. Current crucial problems faced by the human? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the society standpoint, urban areas...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me but also household expenditure. Within the realm of economy, without the...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vernment in construction projects. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as to, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81314878893 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26879569918 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 139.433497537 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.698961937716 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5082806178 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.230769231 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.25397266985 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311280415144 0.242375264174 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720837110385 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136286765245 0.071462118173 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172303274446 0.151781067708 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148645853126 0.0609392437508 244% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.9 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 55.0591133005 205% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.