Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down. Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals. Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion.
Many people think that we should cease zoos because of inhumanity, meanwhile, the opposite viewpoint believes that endangered species can be protected by zoos. While it is true that many zoological gardens are vicious, I think that this pattern is still good at protecting wild animals which are on the brink of extinction.
On the one hand, it is clear that living conditions of captive animals are more unpleasant than in natural habitat. Firstly, while animals which dwell in the nature have a large territory to thrive, they have to live in narrow cages if being taken care of by human. As the result of captivity, animals are prone to many diseases such as obesity and even mental disorders due to a sedentary lifestyle. Secondly, some zoo managers recently are accused of considering wild animals as money-making instruments when they force miserable creatures have to shoulder a heavy burden of circus performances. For example, the news coverage has recently carried some stories associated with depletion of animal welfare in the Vietnamese zoos.
On the other hand, it seems to me that zoological gardens still are places which prevent wild animals from extinction. From a medical perspective, zoos bring a better health care to animals thanks to the availability of veterinarians. In the nature, if an animal copes with a severe disease, it has no choice apart from death, whereas zoos usually have a technical staff which can search for a cure in emergency situations. Furthermore, although living conditions are uncomfortable, zoos still are safe areas for endangered species which only survive with a small population. For example, rhinoceros is one of the most endangered species which is usually hunted illegally for their horn. While it is clear that they get more life-threatening conditions in nature, captive systems seem to be safer.
In conclusion, it is clear that captive situation as in zoos is not better than natural life, this is by no mean that we should halt zoos’ presence which helps wild animals not to deal with extinction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-03 | nguyenduchuy2705 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | Ngoc Khanh Ong | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | tran ngoc lam | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-24 | AnCourses | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-22 | linh.king | 73 | view |
- The diagrams below show the water supply system in Australia at present and in future. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features. 67
- The plan below shows a typical American and Japanese office Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 73
- The charts below show the proportion of people s total spending in a particular European country was spent on different commodities and services in 1958 and in 2008
- Nowadays many people cannot read or write What problems does this cause What measures can governments take to solve these problems 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, whereas, while, apart from, as for, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13017751479 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85496060253 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532544378698 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6179360103 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.857142857 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.7857142857 7.06120827912 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160414447851 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593134006392 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624171812122 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120082489309 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593445580255 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.