Some people think that recruiting companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others consider they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is an argument while hiring staff where proportion of people think that it is a good idea to hire someone who are creative and are capable to work on their own while the other proportion suggest that they should recruit workforce who should work as a team and follow their manager’s orders in a proper way. In the era of modern society companies will need people with both the qualities, we will discuss in this essay why staff with quality of team-player outweigh the creative people.
Firstly, according to a survey by Forbes, introverts are the ones who generate majority of new ideas and work on them. Though they are backbone of creative group, but they find it difficult to assemble in groups and share their opinion while in a meeting or anywhere else and like to work alone. Furthermore, it is tough for them to integrate into a team and come in line with other members to work together. For example, an innovative team member of a group tends to concentrate on his new idea and cannot concentrate on the real work to be completed as a team within the time frame.
On the other hand, team-work is crucial for any business. When all the members work as a team, it will make sure accomplishment of aim of the company apart from success of an individual. For an instance, if there is a critical project whose deadline is very tight, it will be collaborative work which counts. According to an article publishes in Times Magazine, a company which has more team players tend to be successful not only because of their joint effort but because of the fact that they participate actively in meetings and brainstorming sessions where most of the ideas are discussed and results in outcome.
To summarize, both innovative and team-players are equally important in certain situations, people working in a team are more effective at achieving targets and bringing up new ideas as a team. In my opinion, staff working as a team is more crucial for a company than innovative and independently working members as they outnumber the advantages of having them in a team.
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged.Others believe that children who are taught to co-operate rather than competebecome more useful adults.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 67
- Some people think that recruiting companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others consider they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions. Discuss both views and give 56
- In today's competitive world, may families find it necessary for both the parents to go to work while some say the children in these families benefit from the additional income, others feel their lack of support because of their parents absence. Disc 56
- Group and team activities are more important than the activities done alone, because they teach us important life skills. Do you agree or disagree 61
- It seems that many companies today are becoming much more concerned with profit than with happiness of their workers. How could companies take care of their workers in the future. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 302, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... and follow their manager's orders in a proper way. In the era of modern society companies...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 466, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
... only because of their joint effort but because of the fact that they participate actively in meetings a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, while, apart from, for example, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77900552486 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74658021518 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516574585635 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.0598594001 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.166666667 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1666666667 20.7667163134 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331832117162 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121451708778 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769760974043 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210130593665 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0830070981522 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.04 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 9.78957915832 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.