Parents should be held legally responsible for children’s act. What is your opinion?
Recently, management of environmental pollution has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "who is responsible to manage it?". Whereas it is a widely held view that government must be liable to face with this issue, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the environmental policy standpoint, environment conservation is bound up inextricably with hazard situation, which indicates it leads to both air and marine pollution. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between manufacturing products and marine industry as well as an exponential increase in deposit. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of nuclear power is correlated positively with not only greenhouse gases but also dioxide emission.
Within the realm of society, without the slightest doubt, air pollution attribute to individual, in that it would come down to polluted street, smock gas, and engine car. A salient example of such attribution is bus, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take time shortage for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint global warming problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to traffic congestion, easy access to rural area, and even planting tree. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of government to provide more roads and facilitate public transportation.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that new strategic plans must be into taken to deal with this challenge. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
- People usually mix their private and professional life. What are the pros and cons of this? 77
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
- Polygamy has increased widely in recent years. What solutions can you bring forward to decrease this issue? 11
- An increasing number of people choose to study and work in big cities. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 88
- Some people think that it is important to use leisure time for activities that develop the mind, such as reading and doing crossword puzzles. Others feel that it is important to give one’s mind a rest in leisure time. Discus 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the environmental policy standpoint...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e gases but also dioxide emission. Within the realm of society, without the...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... facilitate public transportation. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67567567568 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13822075555 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 139.433497537 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.699324324324 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4473859962 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.230769231 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1085207528 0.242375264174 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0287763647404 0.0925447433944 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462564295032 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0650120288495 0.151781067708 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051115118134 0.0609392437508 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.76 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 55.0591133005 205% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.