The percentage of school aged boys in two different age groups who participated in 5 different sports in the UK in 2010.
The table compares the proportion of 6-11 and 12-16-year-old boys taking part in different sports in the UK in 2010.
It is clear that boys aged 6-11 were generally more likely to play sports than other groups. In addition, football was the most popular type of sport for both groups.
For 6-11-year-old, the proportion of boy playing football was highest, at 87%, while the figures for basketball and cricket were significant at 35% and 45% respectively. At the same time, only 23% of total boys chose rugby. Meanwhile, the proportion of boys going swimming was lowest at 19%.
For 12-18-year-old, the proportion of boys who played football was also highest, at 78% while the figure for cricket was significantly lower at 34%. At the same time, the figure for basketball and rugby were 25% and 21% respectively. The figure for swimming also was lowest, at only 19%.
- In some parts of the world, it is becoming popular to research the history of one's own family. Why might people want to do this? Is it a positive or negative development? 56
- Developments in technology have brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and giv 56
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK (per week) from 1970 to 1990. 73
- The percentage of school aged boys in two different age groups who participated in 5 different sports in the UK in 2010. 56
- Some people think that individuals are born to be leaders others believe leadership can be learnt Discuss both views and give your opinion 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... boys going swimming was lowest at 19%. For 12-18-year-old, the proportion of bo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 735.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 147.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48200454523 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86640868761 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530612244898 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 199.8 283.868780488 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.9472577839 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.6666666667 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126805986543 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637851298077 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723191709547 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108992785493 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0798905815217 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.79 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.