Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The best way of teaching students has being discussed between teachers and school administrations. Once we are leaving in a very competitive world, schools have the desire that students leave schools with as much knowledge as they can. In my opinion, I think the best way to students to learn more is working in a group. I feel this way for several reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, work with different people might increase students capacity on troubleshooting. When students discuss about their different points of view, they might find a better solutions to solve problems. An example of mine might help to illustrate that. When I was in high school, my biology teacher divided our class into 4 groups and we were requested to find a solution for a genetic problem. I was too convinced that my idea was the best but I was wrong. When my peers gave their views, I realized that some concepts of genetic I had no knowledge. As a result, my team found a better way to resolve the assignment.
Secondly, teamwork may teach us how to be more cooperative. It means that working in a group is essential nowadays if you want to succeed in your daily activities and also in your job. For instance, during my high school years I used to play volleyball and in order to win the games I had to learn the weaknesses and the strengths of my own, my colleagues and opponents. This is very much like what happens in a real life as well. Work in a team, might help to prepare young people for this valuable skill they will need later in life.
To sum it up, as aforementioned, work teams are essential during students life. Not only because it might provide an efficient way to find solutions for problems but it also allow students to learn how to be more cooperative.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | mashghanbar | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
- work in a team or alone 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use specific reasons and examples to supp 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- eco-certification 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 175, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'allows'?
Suggestion: allows
...find solutions for problems but it also allow students to learn how to be more cooper...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, as to, for instance, i feel, i think, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 323.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59442724458 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68597219018 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547987616099 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4857387456 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.4444444444 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9444444444 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05555555556 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219646359224 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703442755311 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497921997216 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138765000277 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031735478885 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 86.8835125448 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.