Some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of promoting learning in children life by music and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of sophisticated schools are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that agreeing learning children by music can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, learning subjects by music can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of important roles, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of efficient learning methods. Thus, beneficial ramifications of promoting children lives are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, promoting children by music can supply the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of inefficient learning means are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described traditional schools. Hence, predicted outcomes of negligible subjects are critical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of promoting learning in children life by music far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of essential subjects prove the significance of agreeing learning by music, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Ahmed Abuelmagd | 55 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
- The time people devote in job leaves very little time for personal life. How widespread is the problem? What problem will this shortage of time cause? 80
- combining education and work 85
- It is important to preserve the beautiful buildings of the past even if it will be expensive to do so To what extent do you agree or disagree with it 49
- University experience is more important than a university’s degree. Some people argue that university life is much more important than an educational degree in job market. Do you agree or not agree? 88
- People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 235.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73617021277 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17808247832 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617021276596 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6231595697 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.545454545 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321578387879 0.242375264174 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109403221445 0.0925447433944 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560417715814 0.071462118173 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184492720737 0.151781067708 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043567681798 0.0609392437508 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.