It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole.
What are advantages and disadvantages of this development?
There are many dangerous destinations around the world where visitors ought not to have a trip such as South Pole. But these days, tourists and scientists have possibility to travel to natural areas. This development causes both advantages and disadvantages to both people and environment.
The profits of making natural places as tourist attractions is undeniable. First, when scientists come to South Pole, they might have chance to make research about the habitat and lifestyle of penguins, for instance, so, scientists can work through taking care of special animals. Even researchers can investigate the sea level to find the changes of global temperature, by that way, it will be easier to suggest prospective solutions to deal with global warming. Moreover, supposed that tourists have opportunities to have a vacation to these areas, they can see directly a penguin with its ways of living. Not only gaining knowledge about animals but also have experience in living at such harsh places for people.
However, it causes numerous drawbacks if the government allows people to come in there. There is a huge amount of risk in these kinds of area such as weather conditions or the number of predators, which is too harmful for residents to live. Another drawbacks from this development is that the negative impact on environment. Were more and more tourists decide to immigrate to South Pole for living, it would make troubles for animals to find food as well as their accommodation would be limited. Due to the scarcity of food and habitation, these animals are possible to be listed as endanger or extinct species.
In conclusion, I do not appreciate the idea of letting people enjoy such a risk journey. South Pole and other place like that only appropriate with researchers and scientists for studying
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-27 | lalo | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-14 | TrangDuong | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-25 | pbson639 | 92 | view |
| 2021-10-13 | Kubraguran | 56 | view |
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 84
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as the South Pole What are advantages and disadvantages of this development 73
- Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries Do you agree or disagree 78
- People living in large cities have to face many problems in everyday life What are those problems Should the government encourage people to move to regional towns 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... researchers and scientists for studying
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, well, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13131313131 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81583761805 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585858585859 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7171107822 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.6 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300440766976 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0937095628839 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691206281765 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192481419795 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850878719097 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.