Some people think that travel is necessary to learn about other nations, others, however think that tv and internet is best way to learn discuss both views and give your opinion.
In this concurrent world, it is undoubtedly true that going abroad become a more and more popular trend for public. Some people concur that it is obligatory to visit different nations to know more about them, whereas some argue that it is not necessary to travel because people can learn from mass media. I, however, quibble from them and propound that both ideas have it's solid and weak arguments. In this essay, I will cite light on both perspectives before a logical conclusion is reached.
Adequate evidences are obtainable to substantiate the concept of learning through digital media, such as TV and internet. The top-notch concrete reason is that people can save their lots of quality time and money as well. For example, person can enjoy various beauty of different countries at home with help of internet and tv channel. In addition, another rationale can be considered which hauls me to patron is that today we have a variety of TV-shows, blogs, web services and channels about travelling, which provides us with sufficient information about all the aspects of life, culture, language and detailed description about the any interested area. For instance, there are thousands of YouTube videos about anything in the world. The rearmost coherent factor which cannot be neglected is that The whole world can be explored by just simply clicking the computer mouse or pushing the TV remote. People possibly choose the favourite places or interesting programmes or skip the dislike information instead of passing the different kinds of feeling like physical travelling. Hence, it is unquestionable to say that mass media is the best option to know about other countries.
What is half for some, may appear half empty to others. So public in general tend to distinguish that there are many advantages. To commence with, some people deem that it would give people real experience and provide a good understanding of culture. Enjoyment and experience gained from these trips are distinct to each person. They also uphold that communicating with indigenous people would help youngsters who are doing the researches or studying new languages improve a lot.
All in All, I reiterate that there are innumerable strong factors supporting digital media rather than travelling. However, it's contrary can be overlooked. Consequently, I firmly opine that people should travel to gain real life experience which they cannot find from tv and internet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-06 | Amarendar Reddy | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | phanduyphuc | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-22 | Vuthungan | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-14 | lakhveer khokhar | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-19 | Bhagya Diyagama | 56 | view |
- Some people think that not only should professional sports and cultural enterprises be sponsored by the government but also that amateur adult and children groups should get funding Do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and examples to support you 84
- The chart below gives the distribution of worldwide car schemes in 2008 and 2016 74
- The charts below show the percentage of five kinds of books sold by a bookseller between 1972 and 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main points and make comparisons where relevant 65
- In some countries prisoners are allowed comfortable accommodation good food and healthcare Do you think this is appropriate To what extent do you agree or disagree Give specific reasons and examples to support your position 61
- Once children start school the teachers have more influence on their intellectual and social development than parents To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, hence, however, if, look, may, so, well, whereas, for example, for instance, in addition, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2055.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 396.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18939393939 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72149008164 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616161616162 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9308705179 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.75 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198671214123 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503597954679 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573427741436 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10650724245 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382309768131 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.