Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
One of the biggest social and practical challenges that people living aboard face is the language barrier. While this can lead to several serious troubles for both local people and foreign ones, but I believe that the development of today’s technology could help us to mitigate this issue.
Travelling aboard or shifting to foreign countries for education, migration and working has been gradually popular trend in recent years throughout the world, and both moving people and resident in hosting countries have awareness about it. In perspective of foreign people, who moving aboard for educational or working purposes, usually equipped themselves with certain level of foreign language, which might be required by hosting countries or be used to optimise the effectiveness of their work. International students, for example, are required IELTS qualification for applied their courses overseas such as USA and Australia. In travelling people’s perspective, some common words and phrases of overseas countries are not too difficult for them to acquire. Besides, local resident also understands and empathizes these language misunderstanding, and they eventually eager help others improve their language ability.
Moreover, development of technological applications leads people to new era in which language barrier is invisible. With mobile application called “Google map”, people now can find the way to their desire destinations without asking strangers and confusing while finding routes. Besides, for those people who have high demand in using foreign language daily, translating applications could help them to transfer from their mother tongue to others without delaying and inconvenience. In most public locations and restaurants, details of introduction have been written down on posters, papers and menus so that people, especially travellers, who have restricted level in oversea language can easily offer what they want within few simple words.
In conclusion, I approve the notion that living in another country and not knowing the local language is sometimes troublesome, but they are often scanty and can be taken care of by the efforts of the locals and migrants and the use of technology.
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 84
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory jobs or shortage of money Other argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- Water resources are falling deficient Causes and Solutions 89
- Some people say History is one of the important school subjects Other people think that in today s world subjects like Science and Technology are more important than history Discuss both these views and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 818, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this language' or 'these languages'?
Suggestion: this language; these languages
...esident also understands and empathizes these language misunderstanding, and they eventually e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, moreover, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1883.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62089552239 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92523606136 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597014925373 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.5967540753 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.916666667 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9166666667 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164233785994 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619088879835 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349838164477 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10721981706 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312022677511 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.