Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters.
Do you agree or disagree ?
Destruction of properties is the way of natural disaster, and it usually leaves poor countries with huge damages when it happens. Solving such emergency issues could be easier if wealthy nations assist with humanitarian aides. But I think it is unjustified to impose this on rich countries.
From destruction of buildings to spreading of diseases, destitute nations can be seriously devastated by natural hazards. Children may be out of school and vulnerable aged people may fall ill and probably die. Perhaps these likely catastrophes are the justification of the necessary support of financially-buoyant countries to underprivileged ones. Who would watch fellow humans die when he/she has relief resources in abundance that could be donated that would save many lives, both young and old ?
However, it is not uncommon for the government of poor nations to be closely involved in dishonesty and unaccountability, and this usually frustrates good humanitarian efforts of rich nations. The donated resources may be squandered so much that infants and old ones, who most need them, would hardly benefit. If this were not true, the National Foreign Aide Management of Nigeria would not be on judicial trial for a 40-billion-Naira fraud. So because of that, it is difficult to not disagree with the given statement.
As well as corruption, over-dependence on affluent naions is another reason why I disagree with the view. Many poor countries often seem to be reluctant in playing their part in combatting natural disaster. If, for example, they conserve forests, the lands could be saved from possible flood and erosion, which may assist in protecting agricultural products. With humanitarian reliefs of wealthy countries usually comes over-reliance on them to solve almost every problem.
Despite the envisaged justifications, I still strongly believe that wealthy countries should leave poor ones to their fate during natural disaster.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-24 | Nailesita | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | Nailesita | 78 | view |
| 2021-03-03 | Premlatha KR | 55 | view |
| 2021-02-16 | Ankita91Sh | 56 | view |
| 2021-02-08 | orphism | 73 | view |
- In the past when students did a university degree they tended to study in their own country Nowadays they have more opportunity to study abroad Do the advantages of this development outgweighs the disadvantages 89
- Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things that we really do not need Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives Which viewpoint do you agree with Give reasons for your answer and include any rel 61
- In the past when students did a university degree they tended to study in their own country Nowadays they have more opportunity to study abroad Do the advantages of this development outgweighs the disadvantages 89
- In the time past photographers used to give us real images of people and places Nowadays it is difficult to trust what they give us Is this a negative or positive development 84
- Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student s performance Continuous assessment such as coursework and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, still, well, for example, i think, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4950166113 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15405650757 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621262458472 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3777389243 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.375 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8125 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240386871711 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764251101836 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675156984393 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144127826463 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599997008305 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.