Nowadays, people believe that the environment influences their accomplishments. Some people think their success and accomplishment were influenced by the places where they grew up. Do you think the environment does or does not affect people’s accomplishment and how it affects? Please give an example of a famous person to support your statement.
Recently, the phenomenon of "nowadays, people believe that the environment influences their accomplishments" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that the environment might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the places where people grew up can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the cultural standpoint, the influences of the environment on people's accomplishments can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that people’s accomplishments and the motherland are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the effects of the places where individuals grew up. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both adapting new places and being a famous person distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, the influences of the environment on the success of people might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of the self-esteem of people. Moreover, fundamental aspects of accomplishments can relate to the reality that the demerits of low self-confidence can pertain to families. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of the success of people were correlated positively with the environment, the local authorities would ultimately address living in rural areas. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of the definition of success.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of the influences of the environment on people's accomplishments far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-24 | topraveesh | 80 | view |
| 2020-12-01 | Cheyi1127 | 89 | view |
| 2020-12-01 | Cheyi1127 | 61 | view |
| 2020-09-15 | sattar_iust | 94 | view |
- In a cashless society people use more credit cards Cashless society seems to be a reality and how realistic do you think it might be What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon 88
- the chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- It is often argued that studying overseas is overrated There are many scholars who study locally Is travel really necessary for a better education 92
- Nowadays more and more people engage in dangerous activities such as sky diving and motorcycling Are you in favour of them Use examples to support your opinion 88
- Global problems are related to governments and international organizations What are the problems and what is your opinion 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81944444444 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.57934748174 2.71678728327 132% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590277777778 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.7728617535 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.363636364 104.977214359 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1818181818 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387329993184 0.242375264174 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128839836131 0.0925447433944 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0872289654292 0.071462118173 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226739223885 0.151781067708 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447337670818 0.0609392437508 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 12.6369458128 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.68 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.