The number of cases of whooping cough before and after vaccination
The line graphs compare the rate and effects of vaccination on young children for whooping cough in Britain, over a half-century between 1940 and 1990.
In general, it is clear that a significant decrease in cases reported is seen after vaccinating children. However, cases depend on the rate of vaccination for the respective period.
Looking at the figures, prior to vaccination cases registered began with the highest at nearly above 175,000, followed up by a drop in 1945, before soaring again to 170,000 in the first half of the 1950s.
On the other hand, when the vaccine was introduced in around 1956, cases dropped dramatically to just above 20,000 in 1975 with 81% of children being vaccinated. While the data saw an upsurge in cases reported to above 60,000 between 1975 and 1985, as the rate of medication was reduced to 31%. However, it plunged to nearly a flat line, around hundreds with an increasing percentage of vaccination to 94, and remain stable until the end.
- The production and consumption of electricity by top 10 countries in 2014
- The graph shows average C02 emission per person in UK Sweden Itlay and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 78
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this period most of the complaints re 63
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people Recently however archaeol 40
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 402, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... increasing percentage of vaccination to 94, and remain stable until the end.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, so, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96385542169 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69319556774 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614457831325 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1329575168 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.714285714 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267961878455 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120581703867 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588131780084 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158470224943 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609787881921 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.