The charts below show the growth in the population in some of the world’s largest cities as well as the population distribution in urban and rural areas.
The supplied bar graph compares the population of five cities (Tokyo, New York, Shanghai, Bombay, Jakarta) in the years 1970, 1990 and 2010. The table data represents top five cities by population in 1950 and 2010 while the line graph delineates rural and urban population of the world during the period 1980 to 2010.
A glance at the charts reveals that Tokyo was the most populated city in 1970, 1990 and 2010. On the other hand, New York and London, the two biggest cites by population in 1950, were removed from the top 5 list in 2010. From 1980 to 2010, the rural population was declined whereas the urban population grew.
It could be noticed that in 1950, highest population margin was 12.5 millions in New York while in 2010 it was more than double of that, which is 27.6 millions in Tokyo. A significant increase can be seen for Bombay(5 to 26.6 millions) and Jakarta(around 2.5 to 20.8 millions) from 1970 to 2010.
Interestingly, in the fifth most populated city in 2010 had 8 million more residents than the top most city in 1950.
In terms of world population, both rural and urban inhabitants were leveled off at around 2 billions and 3 billions respectively for a decade from1980 after which both rose gradually till 2000. During the period 2000 to 2010, there was a gradual drop in rural residents while urban residents climbed to 4 billions in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-10 | Sanaullah97 | 11 | view |
| 2021-07-10 | Sanaullah97 | 11 | view |
| 2020-10-21 | jessie_12345 | 73 | view |
| 2020-08-09 | BETO2020 | 73 | view |
| 2020-08-09 | BETO2020 | 73 | view |
- The diagrams below show the water supply system in Australia at present and in future Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 87
- Some people believe that it is possible for a country to be economically successful and have a clean environment Others argue that these two aims are not compatible Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The graph below shows the population figures for different types of turtles in India from 1980 to 2012 78
- The bar chart below shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007 84
- The line graphs below show the production and demand for steel in million tonnes and the number of workers employed in the steel industry in the UK in 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the highest'.
Suggestion: , the highest
...rew. It could be noticed that in 1950, highest population margin was 12.5 millions in ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1133.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72083333333 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48016786506 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520833333333 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1120823869 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.3 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223726912359 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114728380318 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801536996653 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141875223677 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772078882887 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.