Recently we are facing an increasing number of cars, which poses a great threat to the pedestrians and cyclists. What’s more, a lot of parks need to be sacrificed as a result of the construction of railways and superhighways. Do you agree or disagree? What do you think is the best solution to satisfy residents to their heart’s content?
Ever-increasing number of cars commuting on streets and the construction of railways and superhighways taking the place of parks are the two emerging problems nowadays. These issues cause a lot of troubles to residents, and thus, sensible approaches need to be made to tackle it once and for all.
Firstly, great threats to pedestrians and cyclists can be seen from the growth of the number of cars. With huge sizes, cars usually occupy a lot of space in the parking lot or pavement, which creates the feeling of uncomfort and inconvenience to pedestrians. More importantly, road accidents when drivers cause injury to pedestrians while moving their cars without watching their way carefully are common and often fatal. With regard to cyclists, a high volume of cars travelling on streets makes it more difficult for them to watch out obstacles on streets, which in some cases lead to accidents. Therefore, to solve these problems, I believe the government should reduce the amount of cars, perhaps by raising tax on car-buyers. Also, governments should provide intensive training courses for drivers before issuing their driving licences, making travelling much safer.
Secondly, the destruction of parks to pave a way for infrastructure such as railways and superhighways is of serious losses. Residents in these areas are without doubt affected since they no longer have a place of refreshment and entertainment. For example, children at tender ages who always long to take part in outdoor activities, now are confined in their apartments. Besides, sacrificing parks to build roads also result in air pollution due to the decrease in the number of trees. Hence, it is imperative to adopt solutions in order to settle these concerns. It is recommended that the government and planners should have a suitable strategy towards these road constructions without destroying parks.
In conclusion, these severe social issues bring people several disadvantages. In my opinion, I believe that the two aforementioned problems can all be solved effectively once governments adopt suitable solutions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-23 | tramtram4700 | 89 | view |
| 2017-03-12 | Rosemary09 | 67 | view |
- Recently we are facing an increasing number of cars which poses a great threat to the pedestrians and cyclists What s more a lot of parks need to be sacrificed as a result of the construction of railways and superhighways Do you agree or disagree What do 89
- It is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people than that of young people in many countries in the future Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- When visiting foreign countries some people think that it is an advantage to learn their culture and tradition How do you think people can learn other cultures and traditions Why do you think that some people are interested in learning those traditions an 73
- Some people argue that it is good for children to stay away from their families and go to a boarding school others suggest that children live with their families and attend a day school What is your opinion 91
- In modern society some people argue that schools become unnecessary as children can study at home via the Internet Do you agree or disagree 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in some cases, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1773.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37272727273 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03963562893 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612121212121 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.7307788161 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.8125 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5625 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187567539356 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575508086862 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597540195514 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10613510007 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635646446449 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.