Some systems require students to specialize in a limited range of subjects from the age of fifteen. Other systems require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school. What are the benefits of these two education systems and which is better?
There are divided perceptions about the most beneficial teaching system. Some people think that the systems which allow pupils to select a specific subject to study in the age of fifteen, and continue with it, are advantageous, while others opine that the best systems are those which provide their students with all subjects until the end of school period. There are merits for both of these systems, although I think that the second one is more accomplished.
On the one hand, the schooling structures which emphasize in a specific field, when their pupils are 15 years old, make up specialization, which is really needed in recent times. This practice reduces the burden of innumerable subjects in the majority of academic curricula. As a result, it acquires students with the ample knowledge of their selected subject. Pupils are then away from subjects that have difficulty with, and improve their studies, or even their average grade, in a particular field. The graduates of these systems are able to gain a job faster than others, since they are qualified with specialization, which is highly required. For instance, many firms in my country have contracts with such institutions, in order to hire their alumni right after their graduation.
On the other hand, the organizations which impart all the subjects in their curricula enlighten their students' academic lens with all fields of science, making them capable to penetrate in their preferable field in the future. During elementary period, pupils study mathematics, literature, physics and geography, among other subjects. They should learn about all these basic knowledge so as to establish their career in later life. In this way, students will obtain a qualified academic career, and they will be able to opine through many aspects with an open mind. To illustrate this, according to a survey, the majority of individuals who continue with an academic career after high school are graduates of general schools. This is why I believe that the advantages of these systems outweigh the advantages of the first one.
To sum up, both teaching methods are beneficial for students because of different reasons. Despite the specialization that the first method consists of, the schools that provide general curricula until the end, they certify the academic career of their alumni.
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or e 89
- Children find it difficult to concentrate on or pay attention to their studies in school What are the reasons How can we solve this problem 84
- In the past people lived in one place for a long time but now they can live in many different places what are the reasons Is this a positive or negative development 84
- The chart below shows the number of girls per 100 boys enrolled in different levels of school education Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below
- The pie charts below show the percentage of housing owned and rented in the UK in 1991 and 2007 Summarize the information by describing the main features of the charts and making comparisons where appropriate Write at least 150 words
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 387, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...d learn about all these basic knowledge so as to establish their career in later life. I...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, really, second, so, then, while, as to, for instance, i think, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1971.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22811671088 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6946625705 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541114058355 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5889132778 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.941176471 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1764705882 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236806353812 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774693117697 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071883085421 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166092527598 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0853648119413 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.