Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected personal relationships? Has this become a positive or negative development?
Without a shadow of a doubt, with afoot progression in science, human beings are facing new miscellaneous upheaval issues. One of them is nothing but the advent of new technology influencing people's communications. Some are of the opinion that technology has undergone the methods of the relationship among people while bringing its advantage and disadvantage per se. From my standpoint, the advantages outweigh its drawbacks. Here, it will be essayed to address all raised questions in the topic succinctly.
Technology impacts the communications governing people in several ways. First and foremost, although our ancestors had to exercise some taxing methods to establish a connection among themselves, now people are able to interact with each other effortlessly and in a fraction of a second. For instance, by dint of social platforms based on the internet, people from different countries can talk with each other simultaneously. Moreover, nonetheless previously, people had to really meet each other, nowadays it is turned to virtual interaction, i.e., the face-to-face is deteriorating.
This new event has brought some advantages per se. By means of this method, people can expedite their quotidian works, e.g., trading, making appointments, acquiring current world news. Moreover, they can educate through the online platforms and take their exams, intuitively giving rise to not merely the spend time but the circumvention of traveling in a hectic city. To the best of the author's knowledge, from the incipient day of the pandemic, traffic has become smooth, leading to the decline of the problem-related vehicles, e.g., air and sound pollution.
To briefly recapitulate, the items of interaction-mediated technology can be boiled down to (1) the facilitation in connection with other people, (2) the substitution of virtual connections with real ones. And turning to its advantages, the items below can be numbered: (1) improvement in the speed on obtaining the day-to-day desiderata, (2) tranquil learning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-14 | damn999 | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-06 | shailipatel | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-02 | prathamp114 | 84 | view |
| 2020-12-23 | ata | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-06 | sana23 | 54 | view |
- In the future it is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people in some countries Is this a positive or negative development 84
- The charts give information about the amount of exports millions of tonnes moving through Rotterdam port in Holland to various global destinations in 2002 and 2012 and also the rates of tax imposed on these exports by the receiving countries 92
- The chart below gives information about the growth of the urban population in certain parts of the world including the prediction of the future 73
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 73
- Some observers say that police officer should be recruited from the communities where they work so that they have local knowledge Other people say that this is unnecessary or even undesirable Where do you stand on this debate Is local knowledge essential 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 302, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
..., intuitively giving rise to not merely the spend time but the circumvention of traveling...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 389, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ng in a hectic city. To the best of the authors knowledge, from the incipient day of th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, e.g., first, if, moreover, nonetheless, really, second, so, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54368932039 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32843451882 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614886731392 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2000868055 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.2 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205639871059 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635445328903 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517516489424 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114821237573 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565202960348 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.