Some people prefer to work on school projects with a group, while others would rather work alone.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
There are individuals who are keen to work together on school assignments, by contrast others would choose a solo work. While working together could be more fun and beneficial, It will be my immediate choice. But solo work could be challenging and flexible for some situations it would suit better.
There is no doubt that there are many benefits in group work. While everybody commits to the project, the work becomes more deeper and the project's outcome could be more serious. For instance, the best practice is when tasks are distributed by the student with the strongest knowledge. Person who is good in math will do the calculus, a person who is good in writing will write the work body, and etc. In this way together work would become engaging and beneficial. Moreover, one of the most important characters in a group work is that participants could share their knowledge among them and acquire new skills from one to another.
On the other hand, working solo allows you to control the whole process of the work. Firstly, you can plan a flexible scheduler. For example as you are alone you can work evenings or weekends. You also get the whole credit for the project and learn a diverses skills.
Frankly speaking, I prefer to work in a group. Among all benefits that I mentioned for me is also very important to communicate with others and to build my ‘study’ network. I believe that sharing information as a group is one of the strongest human abilities.
To conclude, different persons could achieve high scores in both styles of work. But a group has more knowledge and ability and is a preferable way for me.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-13 | tanya.tlv | 61 | view |
| 2018-07-25 | ilets1478963 | 68 | view |
- Ownership of mobile phones has risen dramatically in recent years despite the potentially harmful effects they may have on our health and on society government should introduce measures to restrict ownership of mobile phones to these who need them for the 61
- Many people have difficulty maintaining a healthy diet What are the causes of this problem How could it be solved 61
- Smoking not only harms the smoker but also those who are nearby Therefore smoking should be banned in public places To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people prefer to work on school projects with a group while others would rather work alone Discuss both sides and give your opinion 61
- Smoking not only harms the smoker but also those who are nearby Therefore smoking should be banned in public places To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 120, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'deeper' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: deeper
...ommits to the project, the work becomes more deeper and the projects outcome could be more ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 140, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'projects'' or 'project's'?
Suggestion: projects'; project's
...t, the work becomes more deeper and the projects outcome could be more serious. For inst...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 394, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...od in writing will write the work body, and etc. In this way together work would become ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 634, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...acquire new skills from one to another. On the other hand, working solo allows y...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, frankly, if, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1347.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75971731449 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59688707831 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537102473498 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5414108675 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.8333333333 106.682146367 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7222222222 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38888888889 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32317909784 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107505366349 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685794065619 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176605248911 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375372347707 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.0946893788 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.