14. Cars damage the environment and their use is increasing. Why? How can this be controlled
The growing demand in car usage is one of the principal causes of environmental degradation. While some reasons can be identified to explain rising use of cars, both the individual and the government could take steps to improve the situation.
Financial reasons and lifestyle changes have led to a growth in car ownership and the frequent use of cars. In terms of money, cars are now more affordable, and in developed countries, every household is likely to have their own car. It was never the case in the past when cars were the symbol of identity and status and only the economic class could pay for a car. From the perspective of lifestyle, using cars brings a variety of benefits to human being due to its convenience. For example, people can drive their cars for work, shopping, taking children to and from school.
However, several feasible solutions could be put forward to solve the problems. Firstly, the government can control the frequent use of car by raising petrol prices and impose restrictions on cars in specific time during the day. Besides, congestion charge may be taken into consideration to ease traffic flow. Secondly, resources should be allocated to upgrade the infrastructure and encourage the use of public transport by offering free bus or train passes. Finally, it is important for the government to raise the awareness of the citizens about the consequences of environmental issues resulting from the burning of fossil fuels.
In conclusion, environmental destruction is a result of the significant increase in the number of privately owned cars and the reasons behind this issue are well-known. However, various solutions could be tackled to help the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-19 | Phuong1810 | 84 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | bunxinh | 89 | view |
| 2022-07-07 | rika205 | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-14 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-05 | congtran | 56 | view |
- A country should spend money on skills training or vocational training for practical work rather than on university education To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some cities create housing for their growing population by providing taller buildings Other cities create housing by building on wider areas of land Which solution is better 73
- Having children later in life 78
- environment 11
- sport 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14028776978 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92148565153 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60071942446 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1068924324 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.071428571 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275318682733 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864198906885 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467730207888 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153465234766 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338253331667 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.