The major purpose of television is to educate, not to entertain. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the influence of television has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “what is the purpose of television?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that the major purpose of that is to educate, not to entertain, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, learning by television is bound up inextricably with prefabricated programs, which indicates they lead to both prime times and advertising. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between academic strategies and a new lifestyle as well as an exponential increase in different values. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of fundamental impacts is correlated positively with not only globalization but also universality.
Within the realm of modern medias, without the slightest doubt, tackling negative consequences of television attribute to parental overlooking, in that it would come down to instilling bad habits, violence, and mental disorders. A salient example of such attribution is a hidden agenda, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take a feasible solution for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint current system problems. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of surveillance and education.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that TV has a major role in both educating and entertaining. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-31 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-08-14 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-05-24 | Sridarani | 69 | view |
| 2024-05-21 | Rafia Jawad | 55 | view |
| 2024-04-25 | Rafia Jawad | 55 | view |
- With the rise in popularity of the internet newspapers will soon become a thing of the past To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 88
- The importance of travel seems to be over rated Brilliant scholars locked themselves at home Travel is important for education To what extent to you agree or disagree 88
- Some people work for long hours and hard to achieve success and some give importance to free time for them Give your opinion and discuss your views 85
- The environment we live in is in danger due to various problems What are the underlying causes Who is responsible to combat this What measures 88
- Should government build more road to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, look, so, still, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62629757785 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32365864918 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664359861592 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6103006897 50.4703680194 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.076923077 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.25397266985 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133934959886 0.242375264174 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0374476735711 0.0925447433944 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542599707351 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0827244402401 0.151781067708 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760800556799 0.0609392437508 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.85 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 55.0591133005 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.