It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as South pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Thanks to the rapid technological advancement, traveling to some isolated area such as Antartica is no longer an impossible task. Apart from a wide range of benefit it create, there are also many potential threats to scientists and visitors in this extreme environment. This essay will analyse the pros and cons of this situation and explain why people should concern more about the downside
On the one hand, it is inevitable that the accessment to these certain areas not only develop the scientific researches but also the economic of that location. Specifically, scientists are able to come closer to some natural figure, therefore, they can observe clearlier many details that can support their research work. Besides, these remote environment can attract a host of tourists, thus, travelers have more places to enjoy their spare time and local people earn more income through travel services
On the other hand, isolated natural area may have potential drawback that can be seriously harmful to both human and nature. Obviously, due to the widespread of human’s interference to natural, many animal have to suffer with loosing their habit, fellow or their own environment. Moreover, it is true that there are always some certain danger from fauna and flora. For example, tourists who travel to Amazon forest can be poisoned if they touch poisonous mushrooms. Thus, the disadvantage of this development totallt outweigh the advantages
To conclude, visiting some isolated natural landscape may be an idea adventure or an amazing access to support a scientific research work. However, because they are all remoted, they certainly possess many threats that can be harmful directly to human. As a result, this should be more concentrated and demand proper action from powerful government or organisations
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-02 | lucluc | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-06 | buiminhduc | 87 | view |
| 2021-07-13 | anna103 | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-01 | Dave Skylark | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-23 | Quân Lê 2020 | 89 | view |
- Task 2 Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements and this is a bad example to adolescents To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Many people go to university for academic study More people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- School should not force children to learn a foreign language To what extent do you agree with this statement 61
- The map below shows the development of a seaside village between 1995 and present Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram shows the design of a modern landfill for household waste Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'creates'?
Suggestion: creates
.... Apart from a wide range of benefit it create, there are also many potential threats ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 83, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'amazing access'.
Suggestion: amazing access
...l landscape may be an idea adventure or an amazing access to support a scientific research work. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, apart from, for example, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34146341463 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74808430845 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609756097561 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.442284398 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.363636364 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0909090909 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1818181818 7.06120827912 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175379424938 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580184196093 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468296261228 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0999905000192 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041336886052 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.