Some people believe that the children at secondary school should be streamed, i.e. taught in classes according to ability, rather than being taught in mixed-ability classes. Do you think the advantages of streaming students at secondary schools outweigh the disadvantages?
It is believed by some that streaming students according to their academic abilities at secondary school are better than grouping them in mixed-ability classes. This essay will argue that drawbacks of this issue outweigh than advantages.
It cannot be denied that the streaming classes still brings benefits to both students and teachers. Teachers find it easier to teach a class in which students are all of the same ability level. Moreover, teacher will spend more times focusing on advanced lessons which help students achieve either 9 or 10 mark with ease. However, children who are studying on streaming classes are highly likely to be depressed due to countless pressures along with them. For instance, in some gifted classes in Vietnam, children have to study hard from day to day with a view to follow up the class pace and be the first rank as their parents’ expectations. Secondly, streaming them on particular subjects will make them imbalance among different subjects, resulting in lack of social skills.
In contrast, I partially believe that mix-ability will create more opportunities for students to develop in a suitably schooling environment. First of all, grouping them with a variety of abilities in same class allow them to improve another subjects rather than their academic ability. To give an example that the students who are bad at mathematical subjects but they are major in painting or drawing can learn physics or chemistry from peers. As a result, children with different abilities study together and in turn they can support each other to enhance various skills.
To sum up, although there are some advantages for students to learn in streaming classes, in my opinion, studying in mix-ability will help children develop in ultimate ways such as both social and academic skills.
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting t 73
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Homelessness is increasing in many major cities around the world What do you think are the main causes of this problems and what measures could be taken to solve it 84
- Some people think that technology is now an invaluable study tool for young people Others however believe that it is harmful for the studying process Discuss both views and give your own opinion 92
- Some people believe that the children at secondary school should be streamed i e taught in classes according to ability rather than being taught in mixed ability classes Do you think the advantages of streaming students at secondary schools outweigh the d 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 164, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... to teach a class in which students are all of the same ability level. Moreover, teacher w...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, for instance, in contrast, such as, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17346938776 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70091373072 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568027210884 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.847969581 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6153846154 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354487891137 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126031530285 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10188911101 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224623264572 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750951192633 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.