The maps show improvements that have been made to a university campus between 2010 and the present day.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two given maps illustrate the development of a University campus from 2010 to the present.
It can be easily noticed that the campus has expanded considerably over those eleven years. Among all buildings, only the northwest student accommodation is present nowadays, while the others have been demolished and replaced by new ones. There have been constructed two additional student flats. While one flat is in the proximity of the former one, the other is placed on the opposite side of the campus, replacing some shops and a restaurant. However, students did not lose access to those facilities as shops have been moved to the southwest side. In the same complex was relocated the University office too. The north is now dedicated to teaching buildings. If in the past there used to be a compact block that contained both the arts and science buildings, nowadays each subject has its individual place. The recreational space consists in a lake placed in the centre of the campus. Still, in the past, this place was surrounded by green space with a sitting area.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-11 | kevann | 89 | view |
| 2022-05-22 | kamelelahe | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-30 | trasher kubarev | view | |
| 2021-09-06 | viviene | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-20 | rajpatel90 | 73 | view |
- Globalization is creating a world of one culture and destroying national identity To what extent do you agree with this statement 70
- The diagram illustrates how bees produce honey Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- School teachers are more responsible for social and intellectual development of students than parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The chart below shows the proportions of graduates from Brighton University in 2019 entering different employment sectors Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 69
- The graph shows the number of visitors to four international museums between 1980 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93333333333 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70278776977 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661111111111 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0673496042 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.7272727273 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3636363636 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.63636363636 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142893981457 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0539785035368 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575608691695 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154366847376 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543379925135 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.