Many people believe that the public libraries should only provide books and should not waste their money on expensive hi-tech media, such as software, DVD's or videos. Do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, an increasing number of people are concerned about whether central libraries should only spend funds on buying hard copies of experiments or spend their money on improved technology such as software, DVDs or videos. I completely agree with the idea that advanced study materials brig benefits due to wider information and providing multi-learning strategies.
First, it goes without saying that advanced media contain wider useful data for students to seek whatever information they require. In other words, there is a range of knowledge provided for learners by hi-tech media, which cannot be instituted by a book. In addition, using modern media, can improve and develop people's knowledge in some special field of expertise. This means that this study source support visioning and listening skills as it contains the speech and a wide range of photos. Take people who learn foreign languages as a prime example, they use DVDs that contain in the lessons to practice their listening skill. As a consequence, learning through videos is the most effective and efficient approach to improve all aspects of cognitive skills, as it not only boost knowledge by listening but also enhance overall skills.
That is not to say that the governmental libraries should not purchase hard bond copies of the experimental theories. Of course, people prefer to use books as a medium for the clarification of their doubts. In other words, they can mark or highlight important points in the publication itself, as well as they can even use a bookmark for their own reference purpose. According to a recent survey taken place in the University of Oxford, some individuals feel more comfortable with the hard copy of a book for solving their queries and connect with the theory give in the textbook more effectively. Hard copies, nevertheless, consume a great amount of time for searching the information; therefore, this drawback sometimes turns over to get a lot of loss.
In conclusion, I would argue that libraries should spend money on the advanced study resources as long as they provide a huge amount of knowledge and a variety of learning methods.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-06 | Le Minh Anh | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-12 | Louisa_Nguyễn | 84 | view |
- Some people say it is more important to plant trees in the open spaces in towns and cities than to build more housing To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- More and more people are relying on the private car as their major means of transportation Describe some of the problems over reliance on cars can cause and suggest at least one possible solution 78
- The illustration shows information about how igloo is build from snow 84
- The chart below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005 67
- The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality both actual and target and the number of complaints and passengers 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In this day and age, an increasing numbe...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d providing multi-learning strategies. First, it goes without saying that advan...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ening but also enhance overall skills. That is not to say that the governmental...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...times turns over to get a lot of loss. In conclusion, I would argue that librar...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, of course, such as, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1807.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10451977401 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78529497709 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581920903955 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.4255755546 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.071428571 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205069097949 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672587176512 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501613232884 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12605515851 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267034511456 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.