Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationships. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is true that the development of information technology has affected directly the lifestyle of people. It not only impacts internal communication but also influents the relationships between the member of the family and society. I agree with this argument.
First of all, the youngsters have heavily depended on modern technology. They have become addicted to these systems. They cannot live without the internet. As a result, they do not care about their study as well as their final exams. For example, young people spent their whole day in front of their laptops or smartphone to play a game or chat with their friends via social media such as Facebook or Twitter. Secondly, these issues also affect their life in the future. They will lack the confidence to communicate with other people as well as social relationships in the workplace. They will be isolated and lead to depression.
On the other hand, both youngsters and adult people are strongly affected by improving technology. Especially, young people easily become violent men when they are watching bad websites via the internet. This problem will lead to terrible actions which they could not control themselves. Additionally, adult people have lost their communication skills when they just communicate via new approach chatting. Such as, when they have a meal with their friends, they just focus on their phones without the presence of their friends.
In conclusion, I believe that this trend is negatively affecting people's relations. Given this solution, it is advisable that less use of modern communication equipment be made
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-26 | letrang250191 | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-23 | Haphuong204 | 56 | view |
| 2021-08-10 | Linh Nguyen Phan | 63 | view |
| 2017-06-17 | eyraen | 44 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014
- The maps below show changes in the Spanish city of Castellon in recent times Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparations where relevant 78
- the graphs show changes in the spending habits of people in the UK between 1971 and 2001 Write a report to a university lecturer describing the data 72
- The chart below shows the annual pay thousands of US dollars for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004 73
- the table below presents the food consumption per person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1343.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22568093385 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78927810921 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583657587549 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0358189433 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.6111111111 106.682146367 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2777777778 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61111111111 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199905239239 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698588515294 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608662553721 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139030606963 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284468625368 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.46 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.