Some countries are struggling with an increase in the rate of crime. Many people think that having more police on the streets is the only way to reduce crimes.
To what extent do you agree?
Public safety is a prime concern to many people. In response to the increasing quantity of crime occurrences, some feel the need for added policing forces. However, I wholeheartedly disagree with this notion, believing that this is not the most ideal change we should seek, due to the potential efficiency and the presence of other more effective and deep-rooted measures.
While a crime profusion is a credible source of worry, upsizing police stations will cause more panic than solving them. For starters, most of the public distresses nowadays are caused by minor offenses, such as the occasional mugging, petty crimes, or similar kinds of occurrences. The existing task force is adequate to deal with those incidents. If we were to increase the number of officers, it could backfire and elicit a sense of greater fear in the community. With more fear, a sense of unease is always imminent, and discord could spread. Instead, clear actions such as the implementation of manual patrols and timely helplines could do better to ease the mind of the citizens. If the public feels protected and has their problems dealt with, the need for increased policing is then going to become subsided.
Another problem of increased police presence is the downsizing budget for other more effective and long-term programs. Over-policing is going to come with extra spending, consequently forming a budget disparity for sectors such as education, rehabilitation, and drug-prevention programs. Clearly, in tackling crimes, the most effective method is to tackle them at the root, in educating and implementing initiatives to counter them before they even started. As such, the extra body mass can only be there to prevent the situation in a short-term view, not to completely eradicate it. What is more, it has the potential to incite fear and distrust as mentioned in the point above.
With such views in mind, public servants could better facilitate changes on a deeper level by leveraging that wherewithal and allocate to better intervention programs. Brute force is the primitive way of dealing with this problem firsthand. Adequate planning is key to crime reduction, such as education and preventative measures.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-20 | gianggiangvn | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | gianggiangvn | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | daidang869 | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | Koi | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | cleee | 73 | view |
- Many people choose to work or live abroad because of the higher standards of living they can find outside their home country Do you think this brings more advantages or disadvantages to the people who follow this path 84
- Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- Many countries now face an economic downturn so it is better for each country to focus on its own problems rather than helping other countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Many people say that globalisation and the growing number of multinational companies have a negative effect on the environment To what extent do you agree or disagree 91
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, so, then, while, such as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1855.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24011299435 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90832208038 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587570621469 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.308136275 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.055555556 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178130580138 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557151162922 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400365469852 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108456260091 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233641940508 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.