In today’s job market it is far more important to have practical skils than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualifications. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued by some that in today’s employment environment, practical experience seems to play a more crucial role than theoretical knowledge and that an academic certificate will no longer be of necessity. While I agree that practical skills are indeed more essential, I also strongly believe that adequate training at university should not be neglected.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why practical experience is considered so critical. To embark on, exposed to real-life provides people with many opportunities to gain relevant experience in different fields, thereby acquiring valuable skills necessary for them to cope with challenges faced in work and life. For instance, a company would opt to choose engineers with relevant experience, rather than those who just score high marks in written examinations without any real-life practices. On top of that, during an interview, job seekers with considerable experience in their field are more likely to gain the trust of interviewers, and therefore they have a better chance of having a position in today's extremely competitive job market.
On the other hand, I disagree with the idea that academic knowledge is no longer of great significance. Firstly, although practical skills are vital, they are based on the framework of theoretical lessons. A salient example is that to become a surgeon, one must study numerous procedures before being competent at tackling various kinds of surgery. Secondly, by getting a qualified degree at a university or college, employees stand a higher chance of moving up the career ladder in their profession, thereby earning a more lucrative salary. For example, how can a person who lacks mathematical and managerial abilities has a job as an accountant or a director?
By way of conclusion, I reaffirm my state that although practical abilities are of paramount importance when applying for a job, theoretical insight is not to be overlooked.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-29 | quynhanhbuiviet | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | quynhanhbuiviet | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | eyraen | 56 | view |
| 2022-12-12 | lariarhydes | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-02 | Drake004 | 84 | view |
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and includ 78
- Every country has poor people and every country has different ways of dealing with the poor and poverty What are some of the reasons for world poverty What can be done to assist the poor 84
- The table shows the changes in waste production in three different countries over the three years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 76
- The table shows the proportion of women in the labor force and women in management in five countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 78
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31391585761 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05303745365 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624595469256 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.2061282317 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.833333333 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198882476259 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656157612849 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531042303369 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11886386237 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220660509141 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31391585761 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05303745365 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624595469256 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.2061282317 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.833333333 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198882476259 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656157612849 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531042303369 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11886386237 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220660509141 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.