In many countries, fast food is becoming cheaper and more available. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Today, several countries have seen a dramatic increase in fast-food progress as a trend, while it is more convenient for people slowly got the hang of alfresco as a daily routine and people got attract by the breadth of cuisine as well as the low-priced. From my perspective, this trend may bring more drawbacks than benefits for the livelihood of people.
On the one hand, the majority of diners desperately need the taste of the food and the affordable cost, while the restaurant is criminally expensive for a meal. Due to the fact that one meal in the restaurant has an immense of dining etiquette to no end such as make a reservation for a party of customers, but the key reason comes from the cost for a meal, which is unaffordable with the majority of people. To afford the demand of diners, this leads to the establishment of the fast-food industry, which is tantamount to the restaurant but typically cheap and has the breadth of the menu. The fast-food establishment is afforded by the meaning of the name, fast and convenient to serve, without spending an hour for a meal in the restaurant.
On the other hand, it is my firm belief that continuing to eat in a fast-food restaurant is not an ideal way for a person to stay clean in the daily routine, especially with a health-conscious person. Although the fast-food is known for its fast serve progress, in fact, the characteristic of the fast-food meal is not a calcium-rich food and this typically increases the proportion of risk to make it worsen. Additionally, the calories amount for a meal should fluctuate between 2500 for the man and 1500 for woman, while the calories of one meal in the fast-food restaurant are out of 10000 or higher, respectively. For example, the people who abusing fast food could be caught by the diversity of risks such as cholesterol, stroke, diabetes, which are harmful to the longevity of a person.
In conclusion, the dramatic increase in the fast-food industry is helpful by the cost and convenience for the livelihood of the average class, however, this could have immense risks to a person and tatter the health and nutrition such as cholesterol, diabetes, stroke, and worse, dead.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-24 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
| 2024-09-16 | Tuan Harry | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-13 | Tuan Harry | 84 | view |
| 2024-05-01 | tr_h.20 | 67 | view |
| 2024-05-01 | tr_h.20 | 67 | view |
- The tendency of news reports in the media to focus more on problems and emergencies rather than on positive developments is harmful to individuals and society as a whole To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Many students choose to take a gap year before starting university to travel or gain work experience Do you think this is a good idea or a waste of time 67
- In many countries fast food is becoming cheaper and more available Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Longer life spans and improvements in the health of older people suggest that people over the age of sixty five can continue to live full and active lives In what ways can society benefit from the contribution that older people can make 78
- In some countries it is thought advisable that children begin formal education at four years old while in others they do not have to start school until they are seven or eight 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, may, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1810.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80106100796 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93642937618 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464190981432 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.2975951904 168% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.8278026543 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.545454545 106.682146367 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.2727272727 20.7667163134 165% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0909090909 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151592678659 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743573423388 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447770199284 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102376114991 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241612041149 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.1190380762 154% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.