The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore.
The graphs show the levels of men and women spent time for education and the proportion of people in the five different levels of education from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore.
In general, it was clear that the figure for time male students was higher than female students and the percentage of people studied master and university qualification saw an ascending trend whilst the opposite was the case for others.
The average of years the men spent for study at school increased steadily over the period of ten years, from about 9 years to under 12 years. Meanwhile, the female adults just spent 8 years for education in the year 2000, afterward, the average years fluctuate minimally and reach the highest point of under 9 years studied at school in the year 2010.
Between 2000 and 2010, there was a sharp increase in the proportion of people had master qualification, from 7,5% to 30.31%. Similarly, that in university qualification also grew swiftly from 8.3% to 32.93%. In contrast, there was a remarkable fall in the percentage of students who has high school, secondary and primary school qualification from 26.3%, 23.77%, 7.5% to 19.55%, 15.2%, 2.1%, respectively.
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Accomodation and transport problems are increasing in many large cities Businesses are encouraged to move to rural areas Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and includ 67
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 67
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, similarly, so, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99489795918 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71107586022 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545918367347 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.5399241182 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.857142857 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235893139716 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113613735745 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134598792561 0.0843802449381 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159489800461 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158998687694 0.0819641961636 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.