People are having more and more sugar-based drinks. What are the reasons? What are the solutions to make people drink less?
Nowadays, it is supposed that more and more sweetened beverages are consumed by people. Hardly can we deny that there are some principal reasons why it might be popular and this essay will discuss measures that can be implemented to reduce the consumption of sugary drinks on people's lives.
There are two main reasons why sugar-based drinks are consumed in large amounts on a regular basis. Firstly, while people tend to be more busy with their dense schedule, using that kind of drinks as an alternative is appropriate due to its effects on people's lives. They can study and work in all day without felling exhausted thanks to the instant energy boost increasing mental alertness and maintaining high concentration. Secondly, imparallel with the evolution of information technology, there has been a breakout of advertisements related to human's lifestyle. Some beverage companies have invested expenditures on graphic designs and trademark, which is fdirectly tagerted at potential groups, especially the young. A salient illustration of this is that when going to the supermarkets, children seem to feel like choosing Coca or 7Up rather than natural drinks
Athough sugar-based drinks bring back some certain nebefits, it is still eclipsed by the drawbacks must be tackled by 2 principal solutions. Firstly, the goverment should promote TV programs on public health as well as the detrimental effects of sweetened beverages. Thus, people could have more knowledge of their own health and have some changes in lifestyle facilitating eating habit. Secondly, the consumption of this kind of drink need diminishing by imposing higher taxes on them. With this apporoach, its prices would increase contributing to the decline of consumer demand.
In conclusion, although it is undeniable that there are some benefits, the usage of sugar-based drinks still have to be diminished because of its negative influences on health. Increasing taxes on sugary drinks and raising people's awareness are 2 practical solutions to cope up with this issue.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-03-24 | giangngoc | 78 | view |
2023-01-25 | Nguyen Ho Khanh Duy | 61 | view |
2023-01-02 | bapcai | 73 | view |
2022-09-17 | tieuquynh | 84 | view |
2022-08-22 | Nguyễn Ngọc Phương Vy | 73 | view |
- The picture below shows the use of renewable energy accounting the total energy from 1971 to 2011 78
- The charts below show the differences in how people in 3 countries learned English in 2010 and 2015 73
- Some think that people should not change their jobs while others think they should because it brings advantages for themselves company and society Discuss and give opinions 61
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 73
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students should be encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views a 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 867, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g Coca or 7Up rather than natural drinks Athough sugar-based drinks bring back so...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, while, in conclusion, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1721.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36137071651 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92284230715 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601246105919 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7462411136 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.928571429 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308635941053 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0975581995718 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766891941482 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200640716154 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0174306967326 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.