Some people work for the same organization all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organizations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Many people have different opinions about workplaces where they work or intend to choose to bond in their life. While there is a school of thought that a significant number of citizens remain in the same company, I believe that there can be more merits to being involved in many groups.
Without a doubt, there are many worthy reasons to contribute the workers’ values to the same organization, one of which is that those companies could fulfill their employers’ desires that they are seeking in their career path. For example, employers are able to find dreamful conditions in one group, thus be willing to work and attempt to make remarkably huge contributions without thinking about changing in another one. In addition, they will have more opportunities to get higher promotions, which seems to both enhance them to become professionals in their fields and provide an incentive to foster their well-rounded development.
In the other words, it is also argued that working for different organizations can bring many advantages associated with new chances and knowledge that the employers need to get during their life. There is no denying that workers will tend to look for another place that could make them more satisfied if they no longer find interests in their field or workplace, particularly salary, working environment, and other similar things. Sometimes they are less likely to bond with a group which could be beneficial for them, such as a safety feeling or a decent salary as they do not enable them to learn new things such as skills or expert knowledge.
In conclusion, I believe working for many different groups can give the employers more chances to learn new things and seek satisfying feelings. Of course, no one can deny the other reasons for working in the same one, in terms of meeting their demands in life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-25 | cinderel | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-05 | hahannguyen | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | Nguyen Thi Thanh Xuan | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-24 | Lunar Tran | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-24 | Lunar Tran | 73 | view |
- The development of tourism contributed to English becoming the most prominent language in the world Some people think this will lead to English becoming the only language to be spoken globally What are the advantages and disadvantages of having one langua 78
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including uses for food and research Discu 78
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 84
- Task 1 The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below show local government expenditure in 2010 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 38, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
.... In conclusion, I believe working for many different groups can give the employers more chan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98701298701 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70012774321 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538961038961 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.6595827453 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.6 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8 20.7667163134 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282322641364 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126606138225 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829581504457 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185626253186 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564582019278 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 38, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
.... In conclusion, I believe working for many different groups can give the employers more chan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98701298701 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70012774321 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538961038961 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.6595827453 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.6 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8 20.7667163134 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282322641364 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126606138225 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829581504457 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185626253186 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564582019278 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.