Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.
With the rapid development of technology in modern society. Business strategies and methods have been filled in the competition of every industry. Advertise is the primary method for increasing benefits, and exactly a lot of companies use some extra content for tempting people's eyes even if some information might be noxious to children. However, I consider that television advertising for young children is unnecessary to be banned.
Firstly, children's education should be provided by their parents instead of the government’s limitation. Parents always are their first teachers in every child's life, comparing these advertising’s negative influence on them, cultivating from parents could provide more help, and advertising could be a small factor to a child does not get a bright future, but it will never be the directly necessary reason. There are a lot of parents who would like to attribute the failure in education to others, not themselves, which exactly is a kind of scare of cannot facing their failure.
Secondly, it is not absolute that every advertisement is noxious to children who are in absorbing and studying outside knowledge, there still is some positive advertising that could be involved in their development. Now, some advertisements have started to add some educative content like protecting the environment, caring for others, and studying hard, undoubtedly, it is full of educative meaning for children’s future.
Consequently, the government should not directly inhibit every advertising facing children, which will never be a significant factor in fostering a bad kid, their parents would have the whole responsibility. Moreover, there are still some positive advertisements that could provide much help to children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-12 | Siyuanzhao | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 71 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | alimohammadi1 | 3 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | sam_45 | 83 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | Anmol Nailesh Shah | 73 | view |
- When choosing a job it is more important to like the job than to make a certain amount of money 76
- Loyalty is the most important quality in choosing a friend 76
- Children are happier than adults 70
- Television advertising directed toward young children aged two to five should not be allowed 80
- In the future a majority of people will work from home 76
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 268.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57089552239 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13312654642 2.5805825403 121% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567164179104 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.4944371644 49.2860985944 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.727272727 110.228320801 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3636363636 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239533498739 0.272083759551 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103561451569 0.0996497079465 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864116756473 0.0662205650399 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158475233221 0.162205337803 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302990073334 0.0443174109184 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.3589403974 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.8541721854 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.2367328918 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 268.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57089552239 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13312654642 2.5805825403 121% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567164179104 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.4944371644 49.2860985944 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.727272727 110.228320801 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3636363636 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239533498739 0.272083759551 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103561451569 0.0996497079465 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864116756473 0.0662205650399 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158475233221 0.162205337803 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302990073334 0.0443174109184 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.3589403974 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.8541721854 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.2367328918 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.