Some people believe that technology has made man more social. To what extent do you agree or disagree
Due to advancement in today's world, dependence on technology has been increasing day by day. Humans are dependent on others for their emotional and practical needs but it becomes difficult to connect with people who live at a distance. Thus, technology plays a major role in social connectivity. I strongly agree with the statement and the contributing factors will be scrutinzed in the forthcoming paragraphs before venturing a conclusion.
In order to communicate with each other, individuals make themselves social to build healthy relationships. In the current scenario, everyone uses mobile phones whether youngsters or old age people. They share their feelings, words and data through social media applications like whatsapp, instagram and snapchat. Not only for communication but also mobiles have played a crucial role in students' lives as seen during covid pandemic when interactive sessions were conducted online to avoid any discontinuity in their education.
Another probing fact is that introverts are able to express themselves more with the help of tech gadgets than in person. Even though few have stage fear, they are getting fame over social media by creating content within their comfort zone. There are many online platforms such as TikTok and YouTube which help talented persons to represent themselves to the world.
To encapsulate, technology has taken socialization to another level where it is not limited to only talking on phone. Socialization has indeed taken a toll with the technical advances; however, this is not a case for all sections of the society. Therefore, financial accessibility also affects how a person socializes along with technology.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-25 | elham mousavi | 78 | view |
| 2024-08-20 | Anmol Bal | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-06 | Anmol Bal | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-30 | elham mousavi | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-21 | elham mousavi | 61 | view |
- In some countries the number of shootings increase because many people have guns at home To what extent do you agree or disagree Give specific reasons and examples to support your answer 89
- Some people believe that technology has made man more social To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Plastic bags plastic bottles and plastic packaging are bad for the environment What damage does plastic do to the environment What can be done by governments and individuals to solve this problem 78
- In some countries the number of shootings increase because many people have guns at home To what extent do you agree or disagree Give specific reasons and examples to support your answer 89
- Globalization has brought about more positive economic impacts than negative ones To what extent do you agree with this statement 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49425287356 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99027357085 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.701149425287 0.561755894193 125% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8593278379 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.428571429 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11045216381 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0388317389468 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.030258266052 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0652878966122 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293232487395 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.