Some people believe that young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same way as adults.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a prevalent idea among the segment of society that the degree of punishment for juvenile miscreants should not lag behind that for adults. I am a firm believer of the notion that the sentence for people must be commensurate with their ages.
First of all, the life experience is one of the reasons why the court must treat the young differently. In other words, as a person grows up, he or she goes through various vicissitudes of life eventually gaining wisdom, which, in fact, changes their response to different life events. Committing crime is also a kind of personal response which simply does not meet society's moral standards. Thus, Young people most of which are imprudent as a consequence of lacking intellectual capacity may commit an offence without thinking about the possible outcomes of the action. Adults, on the other hand, are expected to behave more wisely, since they have enough moral capacity to aware of the seriousness of criminal behaviors. Hence, this particular example shows why two mentioned groups must be tried in different courts.
Secondly, giving young offenders sentence being tantamount to that for adults may prevent their successful rehabilitation. Considering the statement in detail, it can undeniably be accepted that most of the criminals reoffend following the release from prison because they barely find a chance to get rehabilitated. However, children are the ones who most deserve rehabilitation and life lessons as they are inexperienced. Consequently, enhancing not only their understanding in morality but also education, and skills can lead them to bright future.
To conclude, the opinion that juvenile and adult culprits should be punished equivalently is proposed by some. However, I am a strong advocate of the idea that mild punishment for young people is more favorable solution as their imprudence require serious rehabilitation to avert recidivism.
- The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries; China and India. 73
- In some cultures children are told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 78
- Some people believe that young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same way as adults To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that teachers should be responsible for teaching students to judge what is right and wrong so that they can behave well Others say that teachers should only teach students academic subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Shopping is now one of the most popular forms of leisure activity in many countries for young adults. What do you think is the reason for this? Is this a positive or negative development? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, in fact, kind of, first of all, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33223684211 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95745271737 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7355411205 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.785714286 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7142857143 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204125392033 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654645054507 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554812515974 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129052479601 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616009943898 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.