The map below shows the development of the village of Rye mouth between 1995 and present.
The pictures below depict the change of the village called Rye Mouth from 1995 to the present.
Overall, the town underwent a number of dramatic changes, the most important of which are the expansion of housing area, as well as the development of amenities catering for meeting demands for accommodations and recreational activities.
In the north-west, it is obvious that most of the houses were erected along the road, and the intersection from the main road was constructed to move into the residential areas. Meanwhile, in the south-west, there also saw significant changes, with shops being turned into restaurants, and fish markets with fishing ports being converted into apartments, whilst the cafe shop in the centre has remained during the period.
In the north-east, the hotel at the edge of three-intersections was reconstructed to make room for building the car park over a 27-year period. The fitness facilities to the north-east were constructed to replace the farmland and forest park. Similarly, opposite the terraced houses in the west, a number of houses at the top of the east were also built.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-05 | Lily Ha | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-30 | anaiseishere | 11 | view |
| 2023-06-30 | anaiseishere | 11 | view |
| 2023-06-30 | anaiseishere | 11 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
- Many women are choosing to have children later in life Why is this Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town 84
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 78
- Young people who commit crimes should be punished the same as adults To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The chart below shows information about European people of different age groups who went to the gym once a month or more between 1990 and 2010 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, similarly, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 943.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20994475138 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0455271791 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618784530387 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4999563928 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.714285714 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0978231029201 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624342297396 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139860282157 0.0843802449381 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109259902044 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.170632365187 0.0819641961636 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.