Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests and whether they are married or single, Some people say that this information may berelevant useful. Others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is generally seen that personal details of a candidate such as their marital status, their favorite leisure time activities and other interests are sometimes asked by employers when they apply for a Job. Some people believe that such details are pertinent and helpful while others do not. This essay will give an insight into both the views and also discuss why personal details should be asked.
The prominent benefit of getting personal information is the time factor. In other words, some firms require their employees to work for longer hours or to do overtime and if a person is single, one can devote more time to the company, however it becomes a daunting task for a married person. For example, married women. They have responsibility of family also, so investing more time in office can affect their personal life. Thereby, asking these details in beginning can help a boss to choose the employee accordingly, so that company does not have to suffer. Another benefit is that the interest reflects the behavior of a person. If a person prefers reading books in leisure time then he is considered to be the wise personality and to be more serious towards work. Hence, hobbies of a person can help employer choose the best candidate,
Contrarily, asking such details is not at useful. Firstly, it is wastage of time as does not have to pursue hobbies while in office. To be precise, office work demands skills and knowledge and hobbies are of no relevance, to illustrate, if focus of a interviewer is on exploring the interest of a person then he may not be able to evaluate his skills in the given time period. So, instead of getting an insight into personal details, traits of a person should be focused upon. Secondly, it can make a person uncomfortable, Some people like to keep their life personal and do not want to share it with anyone, Thus, it is an act of breaching their personal information.
According to me, this information can help an employer to assign duty according to the interest of a person which would be beneficial for both worker as well as company because working according to the likelihood produces better results. To epitomize, if a person likes to write a lot then he can act as a content creator for the firm. Hence, can work in his own comfortable field.
To conclude, I would like to reiterate by saying that although both the opinions hold strength, considering the benefits of these details, personal information should be asked from every employees just to know about their availability in the company as well as to know about their personality.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-03-13 | simrankaursidhu | 87 | view |
2023-01-30 | ielts_tony | 67 | view |
2022-11-28 | Muhammad Abdurrohman | 73 | view |
2022-03-17 | minhhh123 | 70 | view |
2022-02-07 | padmaJ | 78 | view |
- Vaccinating children against preventable diseases is not only unnecessary but also dangerous To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- University students nowadays have too much freedom and do not study enough To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some studies suggest that children spend more time in front of TV than they did in the past and spend less on doing active and creative things Why do you think this is happening What methods and measures can be used to solve this issue 89
- Some people say that in all levels of education from primary to university too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills Do you agree or disagree 84
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information such as their hobbies and interests and whether they are married or single Some people say that this information may berelevant useful Others disagree Discuss both views and give yo 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nal details of a candidate such as their marital status, their favorite leisure t...
^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...o relevance, to illustrate, if focus of a interviewer is on exploring the interes...
^
Line 5, column 618, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t want to share it with anyone, Thus, it is an act of breaching their personal in...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...reaching their personal information. According to me, this information can help an employer ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 151, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ich would be beneficial for both worker as well as company because working accordi...
^^
Line 7, column 151, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ich would be beneficial for both worker as well as company because working according to th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 252, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...about their availability in the company as well as to know about their personality.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, while, as to, for example, such as, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2156.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 447.0 315.596192385 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82326621924 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66168852036 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485458612975 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 696.6 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.5717908002 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.473684211 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5263157895 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.52631578947 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321006563213 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100211609142 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661024223759 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18729257285 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0821418732982 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.