Some people say that in all levels of education from primary to university, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills. Do you agree or disagree?
Being skillful is the rudimentary need of survival in this contemporary epoch, however it is generally seen that rather than pragmatic knowledge, most of the time is being utilised on inculcating theoretical knowledge in majority of the educational institutions from primary to tertiary level. I also believe the same because of lack of infrastructure at these places as well as deficit of skilled tutors.
The prominent reason behind this approach is the poor infrastructure. In other words, in most of the schools and universities, laboratories are not well established where children can be taught and made to perform practicals. Further, if workshops exist, then proper equipments are not provided, especially in public schools where the situation is even worse. For example, in most of the government owned schools in India, Student of primary and secondary levels have never been taken to any computer laboratory according to the report of 'The Hindu'. Thereby, despite being living in technological world, there is lack of skilled workforce.
Another worth mentioning reason is the absence of presence of industrious mentors.To be precise, the professionals hired or working in these temples are actually amateurs. They themselves do not have required wisdom through which learners can broaden the horizon of their knowledge. To illustrate, in a viral video on Instagram, a teacher of engineering college was asked to write a program on computer in Java by an interviewer to which, she was unable to respond. Therefore, when trainers do not have required traits, how can we expect them to give Scientists, Doctors and Engineers to the society?
To conclude, I would like to reiterate by saying that government needs to come forward by taking steps like improving the infrastructure of the schools, colleges as well as universities along with hiring actual professionals with top notch talents. Also, more and more vocational training institutes should be opened.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-14 | simrankaursidhu | 84 | view |
| 2021-12-30 | minhhh123 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | Kazimobarak | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-10 | SNEHA GANGWANI | 77 | view |
- Some people say that in all levels of education from primary to university too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills Do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people say women should join army or navy others oppose Your views 73
- Vaccinating children against preventable diseases is not only unnecessary but also dangerous To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some studies suggest that children spend more time in front of TV than they did in the past and spend less on doing active and creative things Why do you think this is happening What methods and measures can be used to solve this issue 89
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information such as their hobbies and interests and whether they are married or single Some people say that this information may berelevant useful Others disagree Discuss both views and give yo 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
...ence of presence of industrious mentors.To be precise, the professionals hired or ...
^^
Line 7, column 231, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: top-notch
...g with hiring actual professionals with top notch talents. Also, more and more vocational...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, well, for example, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37741935484 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07405137944 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645161290323 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.2924162938 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.230769231 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8461538462 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0872276591607 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0248521071766 0.084324248473 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327369520264 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0518011993716 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379790996134 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.