Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
The tourism industry plays an important role in boosting the global economy, so many problems related to it have been receiving people’s attention around the world. There is a notion that tourist attractions should impose higher fees on foreign travelers than local people. Personally, I completely disagree with this idea and this essay will give some reasons for my opinion.
It is undeniable that higher prices for overseas visitors can act as a contributor to increase the government’s financial resource to improve and preserve local heritages as well as boosting local economy. However, this policy is more likely to be unfair between local and foreign holidaymakers. Many foreign tourists spend a lot of their money and time making outbound travels, so paying more for cultural and historical attractions may discourage them from making a visit. From my perspective, governments should charge the same fee from both international travelers and local visitors.
Furthermore, foreign visitors respect and admire local culture and history, so they desire to experience new culture and customs in another nation. As a result, imposing the same fee on them and local people possibly motivates them to pay a visit to other countries, which contributes to promoting tourism and cross-cultural exchanges between host country and other countries. An example can be seen as more and more foreign tourists visiting Vietnam has created a good opportunity for us to integrate international culture as well as developing the tourism industry. This also helps local people take more pride in their traditions and customs.
To sum up, I’m more convinced that foreign visitors should pay the same fee with local traveler to encourage them take a trip to other countries as well as advancing the tourism industry and cross-cultural exchanges among nations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-25 | thanhtu000 | 70 | view |
| 2023-05-02 | thanhtu000 | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-12 | thanhtu000 | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-22 | tienallen' | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-28 | cuongnh40 | 56 | view |
- Should government spend more money on improving roads and highways or should be government pay more money on improving public transportation What is your opinion 73
- Should government spend more money on improving roads and highways or should be government pay more money on improving public transportation What is your opinion 73
- Should government spend more money on improving roads and highways or should be government pay more money on improving public transportation What is your opinion 73
- In the past people used to travel abroad to look many differences from their home country Nowadays cities throughout the world are becoming more and more similar What are the reasons Is this a positive or negative development 67
- Multinational companies are becoming increasingly common in developing countries What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, may, so, well, as a result, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38144329897 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89717421002 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570446735395 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5031083736 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.5 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356754728859 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12871702986 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618813234471 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221700953068 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0194497363429 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.