Schools should focus more on teaching students how to succeed in the world of work and less on how to succeed academically. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, people often wonder whether they should learn how to succeed in the world of work or should they learn how to succeed academically. For me, I believe we should study together to support each other. And in this essay, I will explain my view below.
On the one hand, academics is fundamental knowledge for every major worldwide. It was collected after many practical and practical tests conducted by our predecessors, so we need to receive and use it. Before going out for practice, every student should strengthen their background knowledge. For instant, when I learn in college, I am required to pass the theory exam before I can participate in the practice exam. Another reason for learning academics is to convince people of the point that you have made. And if they want others to believe in them, they must have a certain amount of basic knowledge.
On the other hand, to help them persuade them people, they also need the necessary soft skill. Soft skills help us be self-deprecating when communicating and presenting in front of people without embarrassment or fear. And thanks to that, they can easily get a job. For example, if they have strengthened basic knowledge but lack communication skills or teamwork skill is very difficult to succeed. So that everyone can see the soft skills is really significant. Consequently, businesses should also be on the lookout for soft skills when selecting potential employees. They should be just as important as technical abilities when assessing a candidate's suitability for the job. Furthermore, employers should be willing to invest in their employees' soft skills training.
In conclusion, learning soft skills and learning academics are equally important Therefore, soft skills should be valued as much as academic knowledge in order to get a job. Additionally, employers should look for a combination of both when hiring new employees. Finally, both soft skills and academics should be developed in order to be successful.
- Nowadays it is not only large companies that are able to make films as digital technology enables anyone to produce films Do you think this is a positive or negative development 56
- Plastic bags plastic bottles and plastic packaging are bad for the environment What damage does plastic do to the environment What can be done by government and individuals to solve this problem 56
- Students leave high school without learning how to manage their money What are the reasons and solutions for this issue 78
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road cause some problems What are the problems What are the solutions 56
- Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ork skill is very difficult to succeed. So that everyone can see the soft skills is rea...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 644, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'candidates'' or 'candidate's'?
Suggestion: candidates'; candidate's
...as technical abilities when assessing a candidates suitability for the job. Furthermore, e...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, furthermore, if, look, really, so, then, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11585365854 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93420691096 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539634146341 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.59446154 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.9 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12909346249 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0396753158506 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631656247513 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.099478062818 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772868851616 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.